From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20731C433EF for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 09:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239195AbiCDJkA (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 04:40:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54828 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239496AbiCDJiU (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 04:38:20 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73C6D29E; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 01:37:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BB9261877; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 09:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02113C340E9; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 09:37:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1646386649; bh=P/OJmtSq2qgp09CPF849ERLEp/5T8UMZOOvgPKHQ7dw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Z9Aw/O1EticJQGwzNRLpqxvpWEBmbFKbQkPGGIdr+HHWuYsTZ4O3p9C+yAXM6xuX2 JLlVz+rE488neNnd4pGzD3YFdsgBGrak6PdpuVZLrEKbtCnxeAzYmUIP5dRRNc0eAL IxAJeZYNAIP/hUwVXwyySfB6xf+bZUlirEpd6tlDRvFWKocnd4hMQys6YtcVIKN2X3 SBROaJHDcmcuWa2TU9dD4b6BQyRJPd99/92un7Aiq0tqi833bOED+ehycyYQIavycM Rjqu/e0NaszWtHHrHklyWIKL+5Int+l1e6kTWFo11G5TYWdQF78Nfoq1g7e/jRVhlz btqWfybZ5lxKA== From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org Cc: Nathaniel McCallum , Reinette Chatre , Jarkko Sakkinen , Dave Hansen , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org (open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [RFC PATCH v2.1 27/30] selftests/sgx: Test invalid access to removed enclave page Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 11:35:21 +0200 Message-Id: <20220304093524.397485-27-jarkko@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220304093524.397485-1-jarkko@kernel.org> References: <20220304093524.397485-1-jarkko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Reinette Chatre Removing a page from an initialized enclave involves three steps: (1) the user requests changing the page type to SGX_PAGE_TYPE_TRIM via the SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE ioctl(), (2) on success the ENCLU[EACCEPT] instruction is run from within the enclave to accept the page removal, (3) the user initiates the actual removal of the page via the SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_REMOVE_PAGES ioctl(). Test two possible invalid accesses during the page removal flow: * Test the behavior when a request to remove the page by changing its type to SGX_PAGE_TYPE_TRIM completes successfully but instead of executing ENCLU[EACCEPT] from within the enclave the enclave attempts to read from the page. Even though the page is accessible from the page table entries its type is SGX_PAGE_TYPE_TRIM and thus not accessible according to SGX. The expected behavior is a page fault with the SGX flag set in the error code. * Test the behavior when the page type is changed successfully and ENCLU[EACCEPT] was run from within the enclave. The final ioctl(), SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_REMOVE_PAGES, is omitted and replaced with an attempt to access the page. Even though the page is accessible from the page table entries its type is SGX_PAGE_TYPE_TRIM and thus not accessible according to SGX. The expected behavior is a page fault with the SGX flag set in the error code. Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre --- tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c | 247 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 247 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c index 82902dab96bc..d132e7d32454 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c @@ -1569,4 +1569,251 @@ TEST_F(enclave, remove_added_page_no_eaccept) EXPECT_EQ(remove_ioc.count, 0); } +/* + * Request enclave page removal but instead of correctly following with + * EACCEPT a read attempt to page is made from within the enclave. + */ +TEST_F(enclave, remove_added_page_invalid_access) +{ + struct encl_op_get_from_addr get_addr_op; + struct encl_op_put_to_addr put_addr_op; + struct sgx_enclave_modt ioc; + struct sgx_secinfo secinfo; + unsigned long data_start; + int ret, errno_save; + + ASSERT_TRUE(setup_test_encl(ENCL_HEAP_SIZE_DEFAULT, &self->encl, _metadata)); + + memset(&self->run, 0, sizeof(self->run)); + self->run.tcs = self->encl.encl_base; + + /* + * Hardware (SGX2) and kernel support is needed for this test. Start + * with check that test has a chance of succeeding. + */ + memset(&ioc, 0, sizeof(ioc)); + ret = ioctl(self->encl.fd, SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE, &ioc); + + if (ret == -1) { + if (errno == ENOTTY) + SKIP(return, "Kernel does not support SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE ioctl()"); + else if (errno == ENODEV) + SKIP(return, "System does not support SGX2"); + } + + /* + * Invalid parameters were provided during sanity check, + * expect command to fail. + */ + EXPECT_EQ(ret, -1); + + /* + * Page that will be removed is the second data page in the .data + * segment. This forms part of the local encl_buffer within the + * enclave. + */ + data_start = self->encl.encl_base + + encl_get_data_offset(&self->encl) + PAGE_SIZE; + + /* + * Sanity check that page at @data_start is writable before + * removing it. + * + * Start by writing MAGIC to test page. + */ + put_addr_op.value = MAGIC; + put_addr_op.addr = data_start; + put_addr_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_PUT_TO_ADDRESS; + + EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&put_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0); + + EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0); + + /* + * Read memory that was just written to, confirming that data + * previously written (MAGIC) is present. + */ + get_addr_op.value = 0; + get_addr_op.addr = data_start; + get_addr_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_GET_FROM_ADDRESS; + + EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&get_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0); + + EXPECT_EQ(get_addr_op.value, MAGIC); + EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0); + + /* Start page removal by requesting change of page type to PT_TRIM. */ + memset(&ioc, 0, sizeof(ioc)); + memset(&secinfo, 0, sizeof(secinfo)); + + secinfo.flags = SGX_PAGE_TYPE_TRIM << 8; + ioc.offset = encl_get_data_offset(&self->encl) + PAGE_SIZE; + ioc.length = PAGE_SIZE; + ioc.secinfo = (unsigned long)&secinfo; + + ret = ioctl(self->encl.fd, SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE, &ioc); + errno_save = ret == -1 ? errno : 0; + + EXPECT_EQ(ret, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(errno_save, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(ioc.result, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(ioc.count, 4096); + + /* + * Read from page that was just removed. + */ + get_addr_op.value = 0; + + EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&get_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0); + + /* + * From kernel perspective the page is present but according to SGX the + * page should not be accessible so a #PF with SGX bit set is + * expected. + */ + + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.function, ERESUME); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 14); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0x8005); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, data_start); +} + +/* + * Request enclave page removal and correctly follow with + * EACCEPT but do not follow with removal ioctl() but instead a read attempt + * to removed page is made from within the enclave. + */ +TEST_F(enclave, remove_added_page_invalid_access_after_eaccept) +{ + struct encl_op_get_from_addr get_addr_op; + struct encl_op_put_to_addr put_addr_op; + struct encl_op_eaccept eaccept_op; + struct sgx_enclave_modt ioc; + struct sgx_secinfo secinfo; + unsigned long data_start; + int ret, errno_save; + + ASSERT_TRUE(setup_test_encl(ENCL_HEAP_SIZE_DEFAULT, &self->encl, _metadata)); + + memset(&self->run, 0, sizeof(self->run)); + self->run.tcs = self->encl.encl_base; + + /* + * Hardware (SGX2) and kernel support is needed for this test. Start + * with check that test has a chance of succeeding. + */ + memset(&ioc, 0, sizeof(ioc)); + ret = ioctl(self->encl.fd, SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE, &ioc); + + if (ret == -1) { + if (errno == ENOTTY) + SKIP(return, "Kernel does not support SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE ioctl()"); + else if (errno == ENODEV) + SKIP(return, "System does not support SGX2"); + } + + /* + * Invalid parameters were provided during sanity check, + * expect command to fail. + */ + EXPECT_EQ(ret, -1); + + /* + * Page that will be removed is the second data page in the .data + * segment. This forms part of the local encl_buffer within the + * enclave. + */ + data_start = self->encl.encl_base + + encl_get_data_offset(&self->encl) + PAGE_SIZE; + + /* + * Sanity check that page at @data_start is writable before + * removing it. + * + * Start by writing MAGIC to test page. + */ + put_addr_op.value = MAGIC; + put_addr_op.addr = data_start; + put_addr_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_PUT_TO_ADDRESS; + + EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&put_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0); + + EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0); + + /* + * Read memory that was just written to, confirming that data + * previously written (MAGIC) is present. + */ + get_addr_op.value = 0; + get_addr_op.addr = data_start; + get_addr_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_GET_FROM_ADDRESS; + + EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&get_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0); + + EXPECT_EQ(get_addr_op.value, MAGIC); + EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0); + + /* Start page removal by requesting change of page type to PT_TRIM. */ + memset(&ioc, 0, sizeof(ioc)); + memset(&secinfo, 0, sizeof(secinfo)); + + secinfo.flags = SGX_PAGE_TYPE_TRIM << 8; + ioc.offset = encl_get_data_offset(&self->encl) + PAGE_SIZE; + ioc.length = PAGE_SIZE; + ioc.secinfo = (unsigned long)&secinfo; + + ret = ioctl(self->encl.fd, SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE, &ioc); + errno_save = ret == -1 ? errno : 0; + + EXPECT_EQ(ret, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(errno_save, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(ioc.result, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(ioc.count, 4096); + + eaccept_op.epc_addr = (unsigned long)data_start; + eaccept_op.ret = 0; + eaccept_op.flags = SGX_SECINFO_TRIM | SGX_SECINFO_MODIFIED; + eaccept_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_EACCEPT; + + EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&eaccept_op, &self->run, true), 0); + + EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(eaccept_op.ret, 0); + + /* Skip ioctl() to remove page. */ + + /* + * Read from page that was just removed. + */ + get_addr_op.value = 0; + + EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&get_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0); + + /* + * From kernel perspective the page is present but according to SGX the + * page should not be accessible so a #PF with SGX bit set is + * expected. + */ + + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.function, ERESUME); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 14); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0x8005); + EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, data_start); +} + TEST_HARNESS_MAIN -- 2.35.1