From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1B9C433F5 for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 08:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233067AbiCFI70 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Mar 2022 03:59:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45704 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230470AbiCFI7U (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Mar 2022 03:59:20 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3343B6244; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 00:58:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 971BC67373; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 09:58:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 09:58:25 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ondrej Zary Cc: Damien Le Moal , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Tim Waugh , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-parport@lists.infradead.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] pata_parport: paride replacement Message-ID: <20220306085825.GA22425@lst.de> References: <20220305201411.501-1-linux@zary.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220305201411.501-1-linux@zary.sk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ondrej, I just took a quick glance and it seems like the actual protocol modules still are basically almost exactly the same ones as the paride ones. Is there a way to just keep the existing modules? The only big thing I noticed is the host template, but at least for the transitional periode we could probably allocate that dynamically in the core. I think would reduce the amount of code churn nicely and make review much easier.