[PATCH v2 4/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu argument with kvm pointer in make_spte

From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	David Dunn <daviddunn@google.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu argument with kvm pointer in make_spte
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:43:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220321224358.1305530-5-bgardon@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220321224358.1305530-1-bgardon@google.com>

No that nothing in make_spte actually needs the vCPU argument, just
pass in a pointer to the struct kvm. This allows the function to be used
in situations where there is no relevant struct vcpu.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 9 ++++-----
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index ef2d85577abb..45e9c0c3932e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static bool kvm_is_mmio_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn)
 				     E820_TYPE_RAM);
 }
 
-bool __make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
+bool __make_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 		 const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned int pte_access,
 		 gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn, u64 old_spte, bool prefetch,
 		 bool can_unsync, bool host_writable, u64 mt_mask,
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ bool __make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 		 * e.g. it's write-tracked (upper-level SPs) or has one or more
 		 * shadow pages and unsync'ing pages is not allowed.
 		 */
-		if (mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(vcpu->kvm, slot, gfn, can_unsync, prefetch)) {
+		if (mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(kvm, slot, gfn, can_unsync, prefetch)) {
 			pgprintk("%s: found shadow page for %llx, marking ro\n",
 				 __func__, gfn);
 			wrprot = true;
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ bool __make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	if ((spte & PT_WRITABLE_MASK) && kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(slot)) {
 		/* Enforced by kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust. */
 		WARN_ON(level > PG_LEVEL_4K);
-		mark_page_dirty_in_slot(vcpu->kvm, slot, gfn);
+		mark_page_dirty_in_slot(kvm, slot, gfn);
 	}
 
 	*new_spte = spte;
@@ -202,10 +202,9 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check =
 			&vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check;
 
-	return __make_spte(vcpu, sp, slot, pte_access, gfn, pfn, old_spte,
+	return __make_spte(vcpu->kvm, sp, slot, pte_access, gfn, pfn, old_spte,
 			   prefetch, can_unsync, host_writable, mt_mask,
 			   shadow_zero_check, new_spte);
-
 }
 
 static u64 make_spte_executable(u64 spte)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index e8a051188eb6..cee02fe63429 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static inline u64 get_mmio_spte_generation(u64 spte)
 	return gen;
 }
 
-bool __make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
+bool __make_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 		 const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned int pte_access,
 		 gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn, u64 old_spte, bool prefetch,
 		 bool can_unsync, bool host_writable, u64 mt_mask,
-- 
2.35.1.894.gb6a874cedc-goog

