From: "Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] reset: add support for fwnode
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:19:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220324101929.00f51f01@fixe.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220323172121.220a26e9@fixe.home>
Le Wed, 23 Mar 2022 17:21:21 +0100,
Clément Léger <clement.leger@bootlin.com> a écrit :
> > > if (id) {
> > > - index = of_property_match_string(node,
> > > - "reset-names", id);
> > > + index = fwnode_property_match_string(fwnode, "reset-names", id);
> > > if (index == -EILSEQ)
> > > return ERR_PTR(index);
> >
> > I don't think this is good enough any more. At least -ENOMEM is added
> > as a possible error return code by this change.
>
> Yes indeed, errors are clearly not correctly handled anymore. At least
> -EILSEQ won't be triggered.
> >
By the way, even after looking at this more carefully, I'm not sure to
understand why there is a special handling for -EILSEQ ? From what I
understand, EILSEQ is returned in case the device tree is malformed
(string longer than returned property length) but why is it handled
differently in this case ?
Thanks,
--
Clément Léger,
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineer at Bootlin
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-24 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-23 9:50 [PATCH 0/2] add fwnode support to reset subsystem Clément Léger
2022-03-23 9:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] of: add function to convert fwnode_reference_args to of_phandle_args Clément Léger
2022-03-23 9:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] reset: add support for fwnode Clément Léger
2022-03-23 15:29 ` Philipp Zabel
2022-03-23 16:21 ` Clément Léger
2022-03-24 9:19 ` Clément Léger [this message]
2022-03-24 9:39 ` Philipp Zabel
2022-03-24 9:44 ` Philipp Zabel
2022-03-23 15:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] add fwnode support to reset subsystem Philipp Zabel
2022-03-23 16:05 ` Clément Léger
2022-03-24 10:08 ` Philipp Zabel
2022-03-24 10:16 ` Clément Léger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220324101929.00f51f01@fixe.home \
--to=clement.leger@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).