linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helper to convert SPTE value to its shadow page
Date: Sat,  9 Apr 2022 00:38:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220409003847.819686-6-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220409003847.819686-1-seanjc@google.com>

Add a helper to convert a SPTE to its shadow page to deduplicate a
variety of flows and hopefully avoid future bugs, e.g. if KVM attempts to
get the shadow page for a SPTE without dropping high bits.

Opportunistically add a comment in mmu_free_root_page() documenting why
it treats the root HPA as a SPTE.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 14 +++++++++-----
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 12 ------------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h         | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h      |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index bc86997f9339..8b4f3550710a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ static int __mmu_unsync_walk(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		child = to_shadow_page(ent & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+		child = spte_to_sp(ent);
 
 		if (child->unsync_children) {
 			if (mmu_pages_add(pvec, child, i))
@@ -2237,7 +2237,7 @@ static void validate_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
 		 * so we should update the spte at this point to get
 		 * a new sp with the correct access.
 		 */
-		child = to_shadow_page(*sptep & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+		child = spte_to_sp(*sptep);
 		if (child->role.access == direct_access)
 			return;
 
@@ -2258,7 +2258,7 @@ static int mmu_page_zap_pte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 		if (is_last_spte(pte, sp->role.level)) {
 			drop_spte(kvm, spte);
 		} else {
-			child = to_shadow_page(pte & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+			child = spte_to_sp(pte);
 			drop_parent_pte(child, spte);
 
 			/*
@@ -2696,7 +2696,7 @@ static int mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 			struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
 			u64 pte = *sptep;
 
-			child = to_shadow_page(pte & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+			child = spte_to_sp(pte);
 			drop_parent_pte(child, sptep);
 			flush = true;
 		} else if (pfn != spte_to_pfn(*sptep)) {
@@ -3227,7 +3227,11 @@ static void mmu_free_root_page(struct kvm *kvm, hpa_t *root_hpa,
 	if (!VALID_PAGE(*root_hpa))
 		return;
 
-	sp = to_shadow_page(*root_hpa & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+	/*
+	 * The "root" may be a special root, e.g. a PAE entry, treat it as a
+	 * SPTE to ensure any non-PA bits are dropped.
+	 */
+	sp = spte_to_sp(*root_hpa);
 	if (WARN_ON(!sp))
 		return;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index 75e830c648da..891ef217b877 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -106,18 +106,6 @@ struct kvm_mmu_page {
 
 extern struct kmem_cache *mmu_page_header_cache;
 
-static inline struct kvm_mmu_page *to_shadow_page(hpa_t shadow_page)
-{
-	struct page *page = pfn_to_page(shadow_page >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-
-	return (struct kvm_mmu_page *)page_private(page);
-}
-
-static inline struct kvm_mmu_page *sptep_to_sp(u64 *sptep)
-{
-	return to_shadow_page(__pa(sptep));
-}
-
 static inline int kvm_mmu_role_as_id(union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
 {
 	return role.smm ? 1 : 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index 73f12615416f..149a23c6e981 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -207,6 +207,23 @@ extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_nonpresent_or_rsvd_lower_gfn_mask;
  */
 extern u8 __read_mostly shadow_phys_bits;
 
+static inline struct kvm_mmu_page *to_shadow_page(hpa_t shadow_page)
+{
+	struct page *page = pfn_to_page((shadow_page) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+
+	return (struct kvm_mmu_page *)page_private(page);
+}
+
+static inline struct kvm_mmu_page *spte_to_sp(u64 spte)
+{
+	return to_shadow_page(spte & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+}
+
+static inline struct kvm_mmu_page *sptep_to_sp(u64 *sptep)
+{
+	return to_shadow_page(__pa(sptep));
+}
+
 static inline bool is_mmio_spte(u64 spte)
 {
 	return (spte & shadow_mmio_mask) == shadow_mmio_value &&
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
index c163f7cc23ca..d3714200b932 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
 
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 
+#include "spte.h"
+
 hpa_t kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 __must_check static inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root(struct kvm_mmu_page *root)
-- 
2.35.1.1178.g4f1659d476-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-09  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-09  0:38 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: Apply NX mitigation more precisely Sean Christopherson
2022-04-09  0:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Tag disallowed NX huge pages even if they're not tracked Sean Christopherson
2022-04-09  0:38 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Properly account NX huge page workaround for nonpaging MMUs Sean Christopherson
2022-04-11 17:40   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-11 18:33     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-11 22:05       ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-09  0:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Set disallowed_nx_huge_page in TDP MMU before setting SPTE Sean Christopherson
2022-04-09  0:38 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Track the number of TDP MMU pages, but not the actual pages Sean Christopherson
2022-04-09  0:38 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-04-09  0:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: x86/mmu: explicitly check nx_hugepage in disallowed_hugepage_adjust() Sean Christopherson
2022-07-18  5:30 ` [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: Apply NX mitigation more precisely Mingwei Zhang
2022-07-18 16:09   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220409003847.819686-6-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).