linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, paolo.valente@linaro.org,
	jack@suse.cz, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 02/11] block, bfq: apply news apis where root group is not expected
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 11:50:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220413095044.uwxeqli2ytcdanem@quack3.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220305091205.4188398-3-yukuai3@huawei.com>

On Sat 05-03-22 17:11:56, Yu Kuai wrote:
> 'entity->sched_data' is set to parent group's sched_data, thus it's NULL
> for root group. And for_each_entity() is used widely to access
> 'entity->sched_data', thus aplly news apis if root group is not
                             ^^ apply

> expected. Prepare to count root group into 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
>  block/bfq-iosched.c |  2 +-
>  block/bfq-iosched.h | 22 ++++++++--------------
>  block/bfq-wf2q.c    | 10 +++++-----
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index 69ddf6b0f01d..3bc7a7686aad 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -4393,7 +4393,7 @@ void bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
>  	 * service with the same budget.
>  	 */
>  	entity = entity->parent;
> -	for_each_entity(entity)
> +	for_each_entity_not_root(entity)
>  		entity->service = 0;
>  }

So why is it a problem to clear the service for root cgroup here?

> diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> index f8eb340381cf..c4cb935a615a 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> @@ -815,7 +815,7 @@ void bfq_bfqq_served(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, int served)
>  		bfqq->service_from_wr += served;
>  
>  	bfqq->service_from_backlogged += served;
> -	for_each_entity(entity) {
> +	for_each_entity_not_root(entity) {
>  		st = bfq_entity_service_tree(entity);

Hum, right so how come this was not crashing? Because entity->sched_data is
indeed NULL for bfqd->root_group->entity and so bfq_entity_service_tree()
returned some bogus pointer? Similarly for the cases you are changing
below?

								Honza

> 
>  		entity->service += served;
> @@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@ static void bfq_deactivate_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity,
>  	struct bfq_sched_data *sd;
>  	struct bfq_entity *parent = NULL;
>  
> -	for_each_entity_safe(entity, parent) {
> +	for_each_entity_not_root_safe(entity, parent) {
>  		sd = entity->sched_data;
>  
>  		if (!__bfq_deactivate_entity(entity, ins_into_idle_tree)) {
> @@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ static void bfq_deactivate_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity,
>  	 * is not the case.
>  	 */
>  	entity = parent;
> -	for_each_entity(entity) {
> +	for_each_entity_not_root(entity) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Invoke __bfq_requeue_entity on entity, even if
>  		 * already active, to requeue/reposition it in the
> @@ -1570,7 +1570,7 @@ struct bfq_queue *bfq_get_next_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
>  	 * We can finally update all next-to-serve entities along the
>  	 * path from the leaf entity just set in service to the root.
>  	 */
> -	for_each_entity(entity) {
> +	for_each_entity_not_root(entity) {
>  		struct bfq_sched_data *sd = entity->sched_data;
>  
>  		if (!bfq_update_next_in_service(sd, NULL, false))
> @@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ bool __bfq_bfqd_reset_in_service(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
>  	 * execute the final step: reset in_service_entity along the
>  	 * path from entity to the root.
>  	 */
> -	for_each_entity(entity)
> +	for_each_entity_not_root(entity)
>  		entity->sched_data->in_service_entity = NULL;
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-13  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-05  9:11 [PATCH -next 00/11] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a specail occasion Yu Kuai
2022-03-05  9:11 ` [PATCH -next 01/11] block, bfq: add new apis to iterate bfq entities Yu Kuai
2022-03-05  9:11 ` [PATCH -next 02/11] block, bfq: apply news apis where root group is not expected Yu Kuai
2022-04-13  9:50   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-04-13 10:59     ` Jan Kara
2022-04-13 11:11       ` yukuai (C)
2022-03-05  9:11 ` [PATCH -next 03/11] block, bfq: cleanup for __bfq_activate_requeue_entity() Yu Kuai
2022-03-05  9:11 ` [PATCH -next 04/11] block, bfq: move the increasement of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs' to it's caller Yu Kuai
2022-03-05  9:11 ` [PATCH -next 05/11] block, bfq: count root group into 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs' Yu Kuai
2022-04-13 11:05   ` Jan Kara
2022-03-05  9:12 ` [PATCH -next 06/11] block, bfq: do not idle if only one cgroup is activated Yu Kuai
2022-03-05  9:12 ` [PATCH -next 07/11] block, bfq: only count parent bfqg when bfqq " Yu Kuai
2022-03-05  9:12 ` [PATCH -next 08/11] block, bfq: record how many queues have pending requests in bfq_group Yu Kuai
2022-03-05  9:12 ` [PATCH -next 09/11] block, bfq: move forward __bfq_weights_tree_remove() Yu Kuai
2022-03-05  9:12 ` [PATCH -next 10/11] block, bfq: decrease 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs' earlier Yu Kuai
2022-04-13 11:28   ` Jan Kara
2022-04-13 11:40     ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-15  1:10       ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-19  9:49         ` Jan Kara
2022-04-19 11:37           ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-21  8:17             ` Jan Kara
2022-03-05  9:12 ` [PATCH -next 11/11] block, bfq: cleanup bfqq_group() Yu Kuai
2022-03-11  6:31 ` [PATCH -next 00/11] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a specail occasion yukuai (C)
2022-03-17  1:49   ` yukuai (C)
2022-03-18 12:38     ` Paolo Valente
2022-03-19  2:34       ` yukuai (C)
2022-03-25  7:30     ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-01  3:43       ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-08  6:50         ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-13 11:12 ` Jan Kara
2022-04-13 11:33   ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-26 14:24   ` Paolo Valente

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220413095044.uwxeqli2ytcdanem@quack3.lan \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).