From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29D9C433EF for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 23:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347694AbiDNXiJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:38:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37008 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234563AbiDNXiH (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:38:07 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F25DBB905 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9D5A62193 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 23:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93EC6C385A1; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 23:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:35:37 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: James Bottomley Cc: Nick Desaulniers , David Malcolm , "Jose E. Marchesi" , clang-built-linux , LKML Subject: Re: Plumbers conf presentation on -fanalyze? Message-ID: <20220414193537.399dbbb5@rorschach.local.home> In-Reply-To: <3119c35ba1fa7247e87d7acb56e85ea99092d0a4.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <8c5012c88989a8f05a3b67540b9172336c57ddf7.camel@redhat.com> <3119c35ba1fa7247e87d7acb56e85ea99092d0a4.camel@HansenPartnership.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:30:24 -0400 James Bottomley wrote: > > I didn't see an answer to that question on > > https://lpc.events/event/16/page/185-faqs. > > cc' James + Stephen who might be able to answer that more precisely > > than I could. > > It's going to be hybrid ... I thought we actually managed to announce > that but forgot to put it on the front page. However, there is a > caveat: to minimize the risk of technical issues, we'd very much like > the content producers (speakers etc) to be in person. This won't be a > blanket requirement but we'll be unhappy if you try to have a MC with > mostly virtual speakers for instance. Yes, virtual will be mostly for audience participation, as there's so many things that can go wrong with trying to present at a live event virtually. This *is* the first time we are doing it, so the unknowns are limitless. Having a MC topic with a virtual host is fine, as long as there's co-hosts that can still be there physically in case there's technical issues. -- Steve