linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	keescook@chromium.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	paulus@samba.org, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
	hpa@zytor.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhe.he@windriver.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC 5/8] riscv: stacktrace: Make callbacks use new prototype with frame info
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 21:22:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220418132217.1573072-6-zhe.he@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418132217.1573072-1-zhe.he@windriver.com>

stack_trace_consume_fn has been changed to
bool (*stack_trace_consume_fn)(void *cookie, struct frame_info *fi);
to be able to pass more information.

Turn to use pc in struct frame_info in arch_stack_walk callbacks without
functinoal change.

Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/stacktrace.h |  2 +-
 arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c  |  4 ++--
 arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c      | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 3450c1912afd..486ed6a96b89 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ struct stackframe {
 };
 
 extern void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
-				    bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *arg);
+				    stack_trace_consume_fn fn, void *arg);
 extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
 			   const char *loglvl);
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c
index 3348a61de7d9..413abf094818 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c
@@ -66,9 +66,9 @@ void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
 		fp = user_backtrace(entry, fp, 0);
 }
 
-static bool fill_callchain(void *entry, unsigned long pc)
+static bool fill_callchain(void *entry, struct frame_info *fi)
 {
-	return perf_callchain_store(entry, pc) == 0;
+	return perf_callchain_store(entry, fi->pc) == 0;
 }
 
 void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 08d11a53f39e..9cc5013a5ea4 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -17,10 +17,11 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
 
 void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
-			     bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *arg)
+			     stack_trace_consume_fn fn, void *arg)
 {
 	unsigned long fp, sp, pc;
 	int level = 0;
+	struct frame_info fi;
 
 	if (regs) {
 		fp = frame_pointer(regs);
@@ -41,7 +42,8 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 		unsigned long low, high;
 		struct stackframe *frame;
 
-		if (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || (level++ >= 1 && !fn(arg, pc))))
+		fi.pc = pc;
+		if (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || (level++ >= 1 && !fn(arg, &fi))))
 			break;
 
 		/* Validate frame pointer */
@@ -67,10 +69,11 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 #else /* !CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
 
 void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task,
-	struct pt_regs *regs, bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *arg)
+	struct pt_regs *regs, stack_trace_consume_fn fn, void *arg)
 {
 	unsigned long sp, pc;
 	unsigned long *ksp;
+	struct frame_info fi;
 
 	if (regs) {
 		sp = user_stack_pointer(regs);
@@ -89,7 +92,8 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task,
 
 	ksp = (unsigned long *)sp;
 	while (!kstack_end(ksp)) {
-		if (__kernel_text_address(pc) && unlikely(!fn(arg, pc)))
+		fi.pc = pc;
+		if (__kernel_text_address(pc) && unlikely(!fn(arg, &fi)))
 			break;
 		pc = (*ksp++) - 0x4;
 	}
@@ -97,11 +101,11 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task,
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
 
-static bool print_trace_address(void *arg, unsigned long pc)
+static bool print_trace_address(void *arg, struct frame_info *fi)
 {
 	const char *loglvl = arg;
 
-	print_ip_sym(loglvl, pc);
+	print_ip_sym(loglvl, fi->pc);
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -117,11 +121,11 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp, const char *loglvl)
 	dump_backtrace(NULL, task, loglvl);
 }
 
-static bool save_wchan(void *arg, unsigned long pc)
+static bool save_wchan(void *arg, struct frame_info *fi)
 {
-	if (!in_sched_functions(pc)) {
+	if (!in_sched_functions(fi->pc)) {
 		unsigned long *p = arg;
-		*p = pc;
+		*p = fi->pc;
 		return false;
 	}
 	return true;
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-18 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-18 13:22 [PATCH RFC 0/8] hardened usercopy and stacktrace improvement He Zhe
2022-04-18 13:22 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] stacktrace: Change callback prototype to pass more information He Zhe
2022-04-19 13:09   ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-19 14:13     ` He Zhe
2022-04-18 13:22 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] arm64: stacktrace: Add arch_within_stack_frames He Zhe
2022-04-18 21:59   ` Kees Cook
2022-04-19 14:01     ` He Zhe
2022-04-20  7:32       ` David Laight
2022-04-19 14:40   ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-21  9:20     ` He Zhe
2022-04-18 13:22 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] arm64: stacktrace: Make callbacks use new prototype with frame info He Zhe
2022-04-18 13:22 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] powerpc: " He Zhe
2022-04-18 13:22 ` He Zhe [this message]
2022-04-18 13:22 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] s390: " He Zhe
2022-04-18 13:22 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] x86: " He Zhe
2022-04-18 13:22 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] lkdtm: usercopy: Make USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_x able to work for all archs He Zhe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220418132217.1573072-6-zhe.he@windriver.com \
    --to=zhe.he@windriver.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).