From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192u: change get_key functions to return 0 instead of -1
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 20:52:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220420175243.GI2951@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yl/7QPKXer7YtXOs@bertie>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 07:23:28AM -0500, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> Currently, these three get_key functions return -1 when the provided len
> value is less a specific key length value, which can result in buffer
> overflow depending on how the returned value is used. These functions are
> used in three places in ieee80211/ieee80211_wx.c:
>
> ieee80211_wx_get_encode() :
> The behavior of this function will be unchanged.
>
> ieee80211_wx_get_encode_ext() :
> The result of the get_key function is written to ext->key_len,
> resulting in a buffer overflow if the result is negative.
>
> ieee80211_wx_set_encode() :
> The behavior of this function will change. When len is less than the
> key length value, it will set a default key of all 0.
>
> Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Of course I suggested this one, but reviewing it again it still seems
like the right thing. Good commit message. It explains the
controversial bit nicely which is the behavior change in
ieee80211_wx_set_encode(). When you explain the all controversial bits
in advance then it builds trust.
regards,
dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-20 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 12:23 [PATCH] staging: rtl8192u: change get_key functions to return 0 instead of -1 Rebecca Mckeever
2022-04-20 14:52 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-04-20 18:09 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-04-20 17:52 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220420175243.GI2951@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=remckee0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).