From: Jing Xia <jing.xia@unisoc.com>
To: <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <jack@suse.cz>, <hch@lst.de>, <jing.xia@unisoc.com>,
<jing.xia.mail@gmail.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH V2] writeback: Avoid skipping inode writeback
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 10:35:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220510023514.27399-1-jing.xia@unisoc.com> (raw)
We have run into an issue that a task gets stuck in
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() when perform I/O stress testing.
The reason we observed is that an I_DIRTY_PAGES inode with lots
of dirty pages is in b_dirty_time list and standard background
writeback cannot writeback the inode.
After studing the relevant code, the following scenario may lead
to the issue:
task1 task2
----- -----
fuse_flush
write_inode_now //in b_dirty_time
writeback_single_inode
__writeback_single_inode
fuse_write_end
filemap_dirty_folio
__xa_set_mark:PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY
lock inode->i_lock
if mapping tagged PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY
inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES
unlock inode->i_lock
__mark_inode_dirty:I_DIRTY_PAGES
lock inode->i_lock
-was dirty,inode stays in
-b_dirty_time
unlock inode->i_lock
if(!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_All))
-not true,so nothing done
This patch moves the dirty inode to b_dirty list when the inode
currently is not queued in b_io or b_more_io list at the end of
writeback_single_inode.
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 0ae45f63d4ef ("vfs: add support for a lazytime mount option")
Signed-off-by: Jing Xia <jing.xia@unisoc.com>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 591fe9cf1659..1fae0196292a 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -1712,6 +1712,10 @@ static int writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
*/
if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_ALL))
inode_cgwb_move_to_attached(inode, wb);
+ else if (!(inode->i_state & I_SYNC_QUEUED) &&
+ (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY))
+ redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
+
spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
inode_sync_complete(inode);
out:
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-05-10 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-10 2:35 Jing Xia [this message]
2022-05-10 10:06 ` [PATCH V2] writeback: Avoid skipping inode writeback Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220510023514.27399-1-jing.xia@unisoc.com \
--to=jing.xia@unisoc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jing.xia.mail@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).