From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
pcc@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, keescook@chromium.org,
daniel.kiss@arm.com
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangweiyang2@huawei.com,
gongruiqi1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] arm64: add missing header dependencies
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 10:57:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202205131035.qIYEFTpo-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220509061751.3434059-1-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
Hi Gaosheng,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20220506]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Gaosheng-Cui/arm64-add-missing-header-dependencies/20220509-142946
base: 38a288f5941ef03752887ad86f2d85442358c99a
config: arm64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220513/202205131035.qIYEFTpo-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/05d29bfe89ad4e7205d77fcdd8199dd6544ff784
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Gaosheng-Cui/arm64-add-missing-header-dependencies/20220509-142946
git checkout 05d29bfe89ad4e7205d77fcdd8199dd6544ff784
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.3.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 prepare
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
scripts/genksyms/parse.y: warning: 9 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
scripts/genksyms/parse.y: warning: 5 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
scripts/genksyms/parse.y: note: rerun with option '-Wcounterexamples' to generate conflict counterexamples
In file included from include/linux/ipc.h:7,
from include/uapi/linux/sem.h:5,
from include/linux/sem.h:5,
from include/linux/sched.h:15,
from include/linux/sched/task_stack.h:9,
from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:31,
from include/linux/mutex.h:19,
from include/linux/kernfs.h:11,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
from include/linux/of.h:17,
from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
>> include/linux/rhashtable-types.h:88:41: error: field 'mutex' has incomplete type
88 | struct mutex mutex;
| ^~~~~
In file included from include/linux/hrtimer.h:20,
from include/linux/sched.h:19,
from include/linux/sched/task_stack.h:9,
from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:31,
from include/linux/mutex.h:19,
from include/linux/kernfs.h:11,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
from include/linux/of.h:17,
from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
include/linux/seqlock.h: In function '__seqprop_mutex_sequence':
>> include/linux/seqlock.h:277:86: error: implicit declaration of function 'mutex_lock' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock))
| ^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:151:33: note: in definition of macro '__SEQ_LOCK'
151 | #define __SEQ_LOCK(expr) expr
| ^~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:277:1: note: in expansion of macro 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME'
277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/seqlock.h:277:76: error: implicit declaration of function 'mutex_unlock'; did you mean 'write_unlock'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock))
| ^~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:151:33: note: in definition of macro '__SEQ_LOCK'
151 | #define __SEQ_LOCK(expr) expr
| ^~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:277:1: note: in expansion of macro 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME'
277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h: In function '__seqprop_mutex_assert':
>> include/linux/lockdep.h:282:61: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct mutex'
282 | #define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map)
| ^~
include/linux/seqlock.h:151:33: note: in definition of macro '__SEQ_LOCK'
151 | #define __SEQ_LOCK(expr) expr
| ^~~~
include/linux/lockdep.h:306:14: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN_ON'
306 | do { WARN_ON(debug_locks && !(cond)); } while (0)
| ^~~~~~~
include/linux/lockdep.h:312:9: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_assert'
312 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/lockdep.h:312:24: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_is_held'
312 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:245:20: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_assert_held'
245 | __SEQ_LOCK(lockdep_assert_held(lockmember)); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:277:1: note: in expansion of macro 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME'
277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h: In function 'read_seqbegin':
>> include/linux/seqlock.h:330:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_relax' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
330 | cpu_relax(); \
| ^~~~~~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:344:25: note: in expansion of macro '__read_seqcount_begin'
344 | unsigned _seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:359:9: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_read_seqcount_begin'
359 | raw_read_seqcount_begin(s); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:836:24: note: in expansion of macro 'read_seqcount_begin'
836 | unsigned ret = read_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/sched/task_stack.h:9,
from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:31,
from include/linux/mutex.h:19,
from include/linux/kernfs.h:11,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
from include/linux/of.h:17,
from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
include/linux/sched.h: At top level:
>> include/linux/sched.h:1227:41: error: field 'futex_exit_mutex' has incomplete type
1227 | struct mutex futex_exit_mutex;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/sched.h:1232:41: error: field 'perf_event_mutex' has incomplete type
1232 | struct mutex perf_event_mutex;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/sched.h:1512:41: error: field 'thread' has incomplete type
1512 | struct thread_struct thread;
| ^~~~~~
In file included from include/vdso/processor.h:10,
from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:36,
from include/linux/mutex.h:19,
from include/linux/kernfs.h:11,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
from include/linux/of.h:17,
from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/processor.h:10:20: warning: conflicting types for 'cpu_relax'; have 'void(void)'
10 | static inline void cpu_relax(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/processor.h:10:20: error: static declaration of 'cpu_relax' follows non-static declaration
In file included from include/linux/hrtimer.h:20,
from include/linux/sched.h:19,
from include/linux/sched/task_stack.h:9,
from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:31,
from include/linux/mutex.h:19,
from include/linux/kernfs.h:11,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
from include/linux/of.h:17,
from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
include/linux/seqlock.h:330:17: note: previous implicit declaration of 'cpu_relax' with type 'void(void)'
330 | cpu_relax(); \
| ^~~~~~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:344:25: note: in expansion of macro '__read_seqcount_begin'
344 | unsigned _seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:359:9: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_read_seqcount_begin'
359 | raw_read_seqcount_begin(s); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:836:24: note: in expansion of macro 'read_seqcount_begin'
836 | unsigned ret = read_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/mutex.h:19,
from include/linux/kernfs.h:11,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
from include/linux/of.h:17,
from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:70: warning: "TASK_SIZE_OF" redefined
70 | #define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_32BIT) ? \
|
In file included from include/linux/sched/task_stack.h:9,
from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:31,
from include/linux/mutex.h:19,
from include/linux/kernfs.h:11,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
from include/linux/of.h:17,
from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
include/linux/sched.h:2248: note: this is the location of the previous definition
2248 | #define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) TASK_SIZE
|
In file included from include/linux/kernfs.h:11,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
from include/linux/of.h:17,
from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
>> include/linux/mutex.h:218:13: warning: conflicting types for 'mutex_unlock'; have 'void(struct mutex *)'
218 | extern void mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/hrtimer.h:20,
from include/linux/sched.h:19,
from include/linux/sched/task_stack.h:9,
from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:31,
from include/linux/mutex.h:19,
from include/linux/kernfs.h:11,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
from include/linux/of.h:17,
from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
include/linux/seqlock.h:277:76: note: previous implicit declaration of 'mutex_unlock' with type 'void(struct mutex *)'
277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock))
| ^~~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:151:33: note: in definition of macro '__SEQ_LOCK'
151 | #define __SEQ_LOCK(expr) expr
| ^~~~
include/linux/seqlock.h:277:1: note: in expansion of macro 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME'
277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:122: arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1284: prepare0] Error 2
make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
make: *** [Makefile:226: __sub-make] Error 2
make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
vim +/cpu_relax +10 arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/processor.h
f511e079177a9b Vincenzo Frascino 2020-03-20 9
f511e079177a9b Vincenzo Frascino 2020-03-20 @10 static inline void cpu_relax(void)
f511e079177a9b Vincenzo Frascino 2020-03-20 11 {
f511e079177a9b Vincenzo Frascino 2020-03-20 12 asm volatile("yield" ::: "memory");
f511e079177a9b Vincenzo Frascino 2020-03-20 13 }
f511e079177a9b Vincenzo Frascino 2020-03-20 14
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-13 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-09 6:17 [PATCH -next] arm64: add missing header dependencies Gaosheng Cui
2022-05-10 10:40 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <3b692d9f-0f76-33b8-0c22-909a24377e33@huawei.com>
2022-05-11 8:30 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-13 2:57 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202205131035.qIYEFTpo-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cuigaosheng1@huawei.com \
--cc=daniel.kiss@arm.com \
--cc=gongruiqi1@huawei.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=wangweiyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).