From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FB9C4332F for ; Tue, 17 May 2022 15:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350201AbiEQPfO (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2022 11:35:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36184 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343688AbiEQPfA (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2022 11:35:00 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 512E15044C; Tue, 17 May 2022 08:34:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1652801697; x=1684337697; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/DvWvoUGI84WnbT8SvQg0KISEoV8wlnpcbdutvGK/n8=; b=HSFILJ6/kQHcbmZ7SB+ingaQwJYLdUvmNU3ghSGO/gKH4pfieEw6u4Vj gMcUyqlIXDfpM805j69KYc5Zixz/7NRqBuB1plCQcC5MSPVLKG1eoQv+s +hGibOnG6nVLZGl5YjJMtd0W0rasD0MXj1b32mJ5FqlkZZfas9hAbkhEK LFdhmpER4Q9WUwpQka8rmpYjwiul+1PjKdgVMC/0u8ZUql08GsZXFJgH5 2VzP2ooKTNJTOTyWYJFAR1SZdR7zVqXNrLWh4UzCC5iZjq3w6K8+uRUVS L1XqxbyMCUFtMMuSot3/FwnxlddJkvXopWzAKgE21SBYdJys1Rhz0NH5O Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10350"; a="251732976" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,233,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="251732976" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 May 2022 08:34:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,233,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="897725525" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 May 2022 08:34:50 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 69F50646; Tue, 17 May 2022 18:34:50 +0300 (EEST) From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Sean Christopherson , Andrew Morton , Joerg Roedel , Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Andi Kleen , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , David Rientjes , Vlastimil Babka , Tom Lendacky , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Paolo Bonzini , Ingo Molnar , Varad Gautam , Dario Faggioli , Dave Hansen , Mike Rapoport , David Hildenbrand , marcelo.cerri@canonical.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com, khalid.elmously@canonical.com, philip.cox@canonical.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: [PATCHv6 03/15] efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820() Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 18:34:32 +0300 Message-Id: <20220517153444.11195-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220517153444.11195-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> References: <20220517153444.11195-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Currently allocate_e820() only interested in the size of map and size of memory descriptor to determine how many e820 entries the kernel needs. UEFI Specification version 2.9 introduces a new memory type -- unaccepted memory. To track unaccepted memory kernel needs to allocate a bitmap. The size of the bitmap is dependent on the maximum physical address present in the system. A full memory map is required to find the maximum address. Modify allocate_e820() to get a full memory map. This is preparation for the next patch that implements handling of unaccepted memory in EFI stub. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov --- drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c | 28 +++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c index 01ddd4502e28..252ee222ca1e 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c @@ -569,31 +569,27 @@ static efi_status_t alloc_e820ext(u32 nr_desc, struct setup_data **e820ext, } static efi_status_t allocate_e820(struct boot_params *params, + struct efi_boot_memmap *map, struct setup_data **e820ext, u32 *e820ext_size) { - unsigned long map_size, desc_size, map_key; efi_status_t status; - __u32 nr_desc, desc_version; + __u32 nr_desc; - /* Only need the size of the mem map and size of each mem descriptor */ - map_size = 0; - status = efi_bs_call(get_memory_map, &map_size, NULL, &map_key, - &desc_size, &desc_version); - if (status != EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL) - return (status != EFI_SUCCESS) ? status : EFI_UNSUPPORTED; - - nr_desc = map_size / desc_size + EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS; + status = efi_get_memory_map(map); + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) + return status; - if (nr_desc > ARRAY_SIZE(params->e820_table)) { - u32 nr_e820ext = nr_desc - ARRAY_SIZE(params->e820_table); + nr_desc = *map->map_size / *map->desc_size; + if (nr_desc > ARRAY_SIZE(params->e820_table) - EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS) { + u32 nr_e820ext = nr_desc - ARRAY_SIZE(params->e820_table) + + EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS; status = alloc_e820ext(nr_e820ext, e820ext, e820ext_size); - if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) - return status; } - return EFI_SUCCESS; + efi_bs_call(free_pool, *map->map); + return status; } struct exit_boot_struct { @@ -642,7 +638,7 @@ static efi_status_t exit_boot(struct boot_params *boot_params, void *handle) priv.boot_params = boot_params; priv.efi = &boot_params->efi_info; - status = allocate_e820(boot_params, &e820ext, &e820ext_size); + status = allocate_e820(boot_params, &map, &e820ext, &e820ext_size); if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) return status; -- 2.35.1