linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kohei Tarumizu <tarumizu.kohei@fujitsu.com>
To: fenghua.yu@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Fix to restore to original value when re-enabling hardware prefetch register
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 13:55:17 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220518045517.2066518-1-tarumizu.kohei@fujitsu.com> (raw)

The current pseudo_lock.c code overwrites the value of the
MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL to 0 even if the original value is not 0.
Therefore, modify it to save and restore the original values.

Fixes: 018961ae5579 ("x86/intel_rdt: Pseudo-lock region creation/removal core")
Fixes: 443810fe6160 ("x86/intel_rdt: Create debugfs files for pseudo-locking testing")
Fixes: 8a2fc0e1bc0c ("x86/intel_rdt: More precise L2 hit/miss measurements")
Signed-off-by: Kohei Tarumizu <tarumizu.kohei@fujitsu.com>
---
This patch was previously one of the following my patch series:.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220420030223.689259-7-tarumizu.kohei@fujitsu.com/

However, it doesn't depend on my patch series, so I extracted it as a
separate patch.

Best regards,
Kohei Tarumizu
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
index db813f819ad6..4d8398986f78 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
@@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ static int pseudo_lock_fn(void *_rdtgrp)
 	struct pseudo_lock_region *plr = rdtgrp->plr;
 	u32 rmid_p, closid_p;
 	unsigned long i;
+	u64 saved_msr;
 #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
 	/*
 	 * The registers used for local register variables are also used
@@ -463,6 +464,7 @@ static int pseudo_lock_fn(void *_rdtgrp)
 	 * the buffer and evict pseudo-locked memory read earlier from the
 	 * cache.
 	 */
+	saved_msr = __rdmsr(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL);
 	__wrmsr(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, prefetch_disable_bits, 0x0);
 	closid_p = this_cpu_read(pqr_state.cur_closid);
 	rmid_p = this_cpu_read(pqr_state.cur_rmid);
@@ -514,7 +516,7 @@ static int pseudo_lock_fn(void *_rdtgrp)
 	__wrmsr(IA32_PQR_ASSOC, rmid_p, closid_p);
 
 	/* Re-enable the hardware prefetcher(s) */
-	wrmsr(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, 0x0, 0x0);
+	wrmsrl(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, saved_msr);
 	local_irq_enable();
 
 	plr->thread_done = 1;
@@ -871,6 +873,7 @@ bool rdtgroup_pseudo_locked_in_hierarchy(struct rdt_domain *d)
 static int measure_cycles_lat_fn(void *_plr)
 {
 	struct pseudo_lock_region *plr = _plr;
+	u32 saved_low, saved_high;
 	unsigned long i;
 	u64 start, end;
 	void *mem_r;
@@ -879,6 +882,7 @@ static int measure_cycles_lat_fn(void *_plr)
 	/*
 	 * Disable hardware prefetchers.
 	 */
+	rdmsr(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, saved_low, saved_high);
 	wrmsr(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, prefetch_disable_bits, 0x0);
 	mem_r = READ_ONCE(plr->kmem);
 	/*
@@ -895,7 +899,7 @@ static int measure_cycles_lat_fn(void *_plr)
 		end = rdtsc_ordered();
 		trace_pseudo_lock_mem_latency((u32)(end - start));
 	}
-	wrmsr(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, 0x0, 0x0);
+	wrmsr(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, saved_low, saved_high);
 	local_irq_enable();
 	plr->thread_done = 1;
 	wake_up_interruptible(&plr->lock_thread_wq);
@@ -940,6 +944,7 @@ static int measure_residency_fn(struct perf_event_attr *miss_attr,
 	u64 hits_before = 0, hits_after = 0, miss_before = 0, miss_after = 0;
 	struct perf_event *miss_event, *hit_event;
 	int hit_pmcnum, miss_pmcnum;
+	u32 saved_low, saved_high;
 	unsigned int line_size;
 	unsigned int size;
 	unsigned long i;
@@ -973,6 +978,7 @@ static int measure_residency_fn(struct perf_event_attr *miss_attr,
 	/*
 	 * Disable hardware prefetchers.
 	 */
+	rdmsr(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, saved_low, saved_high);
 	wrmsr(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, prefetch_disable_bits, 0x0);
 
 	/* Initialize rest of local variables */
@@ -1031,7 +1037,7 @@ static int measure_residency_fn(struct perf_event_attr *miss_attr,
 	 */
 	rmb();
 	/* Re-enable hardware prefetchers */
-	wrmsr(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, 0x0, 0x0);
+	wrmsr(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, saved_low, saved_high);
 	local_irq_enable();
 out_hit:
 	perf_event_release_kernel(hit_event);
-- 
2.27.0


             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-18  4:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-18  4:55 Kohei Tarumizu [this message]
2022-05-24 18:38 ` [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Fix to restore to original value when re-enabling hardware prefetch register Reinette Chatre
2022-05-24 18:41 ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-24 18:56   ` Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220518045517.2066518-1-tarumizu.kohei@fujitsu.com \
    --to=tarumizu.kohei@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).