linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_alloc: Remove unnecessary page == NULL check in rmqueue
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 13:13:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220519121341.GV3441@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a0c9b7c-3620-3e0f-7510-d0fc3fa6ceda@suse.cz>

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 12:57:01PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 5/12/22 10:50, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > The VM_BUG_ON check for a valid page can be avoided with a simple
> > change in the flow. The ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK is unlikely in general
> > and even more unlikely if the page allocation failed so mark the
> > branch unlikely.
> 
> Hm, so that makes a DEBUG_VM config avoid the check. On the other hand,
> it puts it on the path returning from rmqueue_pcplist() for all configs,
> and that should be the fast path. So unless things further change in the
> following patches, it doesn't seem that useful?
> 

You're right -- the fast path ends up with both a if
(page) and if (!page) checks. Andrew, can you drop the patch
mm-page_alloc-remove-unnecessary-page-==-null-check-in-rmqueue.patch from
your tree please?

Originally the flow was important when I was writing the patch and later
became unnecessary. However, it reminded me of another problem I thought
of when writing this and then forgotten to note it in the changelog. If
the page allocation fails then ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK should still be
tested and cleared before waking kswapd. It could happen if an allocation
attempt tried to fallback to another migratetype and still fail to find
a suitable page. This is true whether going through the PCP lists or not.

So what do you think of me adding this patch to a follow-up series?

--8<--
mm/page_alloc: Remove mistaken page == NULL check in rmqueue

If a page allocation fails, the ZONE_BOOSTER_WATERMARK should be tested,
cleared and kswapd woken whether the allocation attempt was via the PCP
or directly via the buddy list.

Remove the page == NULL so the ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK bit is checked
unconditionally. As it is unlikely that ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK is set,
mark the branch accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 1c4c54503a5d..61d5bc2efffe 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3765,12 +3765,10 @@ struct page *rmqueue(struct zone *preferred_zone,
 
 	page = rmqueue_buddy(preferred_zone, zone, order, alloc_flags,
 							migratetype);
-	if (unlikely(!page))
-		return NULL;
 
 out:
 	/* Separate test+clear to avoid unnecessary atomics */
-	if (test_bit(ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK, &zone->flags)) {
+	if (unlikely(test_bit(ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK, &zone->flags))) {
 		clear_bit(ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK, &zone->flags);
 		wakeup_kswapd(zone, 0, 0, zone_idx(zone));
 	}

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-19 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-12  8:50 [PATCH 0/6] Drain remote per-cpu directly v3 Mel Gorman
2022-05-12  8:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/page_alloc: Add page->buddy_list and page->pcp_list Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 11:59   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-19  9:36   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-05-12  8:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/page_alloc: Use only one PCP list for THP-sized allocations Mel Gorman
2022-05-19  9:45   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-05-12  8:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/page_alloc: Split out buddy removal code from rmqueue into separate helper Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 12:01   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-19  9:52   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-05-23 16:09   ` Qais Yousef
2022-05-24 11:55     ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-25 11:23       ` Qais Yousef
2022-05-12  8:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_alloc: Remove unnecessary page == NULL check in rmqueue Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 12:03   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-19 10:57   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-05-19 12:13     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2022-05-19 12:26       ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-05-12  8:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/page_alloc: Protect PCP lists with a spinlock Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 12:22   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-12  8:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm/page_alloc: Remotely drain per-cpu lists Mel Gorman
2022-05-12 19:37   ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-13 15:04     ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 15:19       ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-13 18:23         ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-17 12:57           ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-12 19:43 ` [PATCH 0/6] Drain remote per-cpu directly v3 Andrew Morton
2022-05-13 14:23   ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 19:38     ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-16 10:53       ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 12:24 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-17 23:35 ` Qian Cai
2022-05-18 12:51   ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-18 16:27     ` Qian Cai
2022-05-18 17:15       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-19 13:29         ` Qian Cai
2022-05-19 19:15           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-19 21:05             ` Qian Cai
2022-05-19 21:29               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-18 17:26   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-18 17:44     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-18 18:01 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-26 17:19 ` Qian Cai
2022-05-27  8:39   ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-27 12:58     ` Qian Cai
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-09 13:07 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Drain remote per-cpu directly v2 Mel Gorman
2022-05-09 13:08 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_alloc: Remove unnecessary page == NULL check in rmqueue Mel Gorman
2022-04-20  9:59 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Drain remote per-cpu directly Mel Gorman
2022-04-20  9:59 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_alloc: Remove unnecessary page == NULL check in rmqueue Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220519121341.GV3441@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).