From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BD9C433F5 for ; Sun, 22 May 2022 15:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347652AbiEVPFx (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2022 11:05:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45816 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230290AbiEVPFv (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2022 11:05:51 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B4733A2D; Sun, 22 May 2022 08:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 6B3541C0B82; Sun, 22 May 2022 17:05:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 17:05:47 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Benjamin Tissoires Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Pablo Ceballos , Jiri Kosina , lkml , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: Driver for Google Hangouts Meet Speakermic Message-ID: <20220522150546.GA8071@localhost> References: <20220405183953.2094007-1-pceballos@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > No, that is exactly what I had in mind, thank you. Please submit this > > entry to upstream systemd/udev project (and we can cherry-pick it into > > our udev as well). > > > > In general I think we should try to avoid trivial "fixup" HID drivers if > > it is possible. I also wondered if we could be supplying fixed-up HID > > descriptors via request_firmware() for HID devices. > > Just FYI, in case you haven't noticed it :) > I am currently working on supporting exactly this kind of fixups > through eBPF. I had in the past a request_firmware() patch for wacom Is that good idea? eBPF is fairly dangerous thing, so I'd preffer basic functionality not depend on it... Best regards, Pavel