linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Avoid leak OF node on error
@ 2022-05-23 11:11 cgel.zte
  2022-05-23 11:53 ` Johan Hovold
  2022-05-23 13:27 ` Sudeep Holla
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: cgel.zte @ 2022-05-23 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sudeep.holla
  Cc: cristian.marussi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Minghao Chi,
	Zeal Robot

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

The OF node should be put before returning error in smc_chan_available(),
otherwise node's refcount will be leaked.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
index 745acfdd0b3d..43018be70edc 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
@@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ static irqreturn_t smc_msg_done_isr(int irq, void *data)
 static bool smc_chan_available(struct device *dev, int idx)
 {
 	struct device_node *np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "shmem", 0);
+	of_node_put(np);
 	if (!np)
 		return false;
 
-	of_node_put(np);
 	return true;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Avoid leak OF node on error
  2022-05-23 11:11 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Avoid leak OF node on error cgel.zte
@ 2022-05-23 11:53 ` Johan Hovold
  2022-05-23 13:27 ` Sudeep Holla
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Johan Hovold @ 2022-05-23 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cgel.zte
  Cc: sudeep.holla, cristian.marussi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
	Minghao Chi, Zeal Robot

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 11:11:16AM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> The OF node should be put before returning error in smc_chan_available(),
> otherwise node's refcount will be leaked.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
> index 745acfdd0b3d..43018be70edc 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
> @@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ static irqreturn_t smc_msg_done_isr(int irq, void *data)
>  static bool smc_chan_available(struct device *dev, int idx)
>  {
>  	struct device_node *np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "shmem", 0);
> +	of_node_put(np);
>  	if (!np)
>  		return false;
>  
> -	of_node_put(np);
>  	return true;
>  }

NAK

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Avoid leak OF node on error
  2022-05-23 11:11 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Avoid leak OF node on error cgel.zte
  2022-05-23 11:53 ` Johan Hovold
@ 2022-05-23 13:27 ` Sudeep Holla
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2022-05-23 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cgel.zte
  Cc: cristian.marussi, linux-arm-kernel, Sudeep Holla, linux-kernel,
	Minghao Chi, Zeal Robot

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 11:11:16AM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> The OF node should be put before returning error in smc_chan_available(),
> otherwise node's refcount will be leaked.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
> index 745acfdd0b3d..43018be70edc 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
> @@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ static irqreturn_t smc_msg_done_isr(int irq, void *data)
>  static bool smc_chan_available(struct device *dev, int idx)
>  {
>  	struct device_node *np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "shmem", 0);
> +	of_node_put(np);

While this may work as of_node_put handles NULL as argument, what is the
point of unnecessary of_node_put(NULL) here ?

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-23 13:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-23 11:11 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Avoid leak OF node on error cgel.zte
2022-05-23 11:53 ` Johan Hovold
2022-05-23 13:27 ` Sudeep Holla

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).