From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] iommu/vt-d: Use iommu_get_domain_for_dev() in debugfs
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 09:14:12 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220530121412.GX1343366@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eda4d688-257b-d12a-56c0-0f9d3a10ef8c@linux.intel.com>
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 01:14:46PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> From 1e87b5df40c6ce9414cdd03988c3b52bfb17af5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 10:18:56 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: debugfs: Remove device_domain_lock usage
>
> The domain_translation_struct debugfs node is used to dump static
> mappings of PCI devices. It potentially races with setting new
> domains to devices and the iommu_map/unmap() interfaces. The existing
> code tries to use the global spinlock device_domain_lock to avoid the
> races, but this is problematical as this lock is only used to protect
> the device tracking lists of the domains.
>
> Instead of using an immature lock to cover up the problem, it's better
> to explicitly restrict the use of this debugfs node. This also makes
> device_domain_lock static.
What does "explicitly restrict" mean?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-30 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-27 6:30 [PATCH 00/12] iommu/vt-d: Optimize the use of locks Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 6:30 ` [PATCH 01/12] iommu/vt-d: Use iommu_get_domain_for_dev() in debugfs Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 14:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-29 5:14 ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-30 12:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-05-31 3:02 ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-31 13:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-31 14:11 ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-31 14:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-31 15:01 ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-31 15:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-31 16:01 ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-31 16:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-31 18:07 ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-31 18:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-31 21:22 ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-31 23:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-01 8:53 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-01 12:18 ` Joao Martins
2022-06-01 12:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-01 13:52 ` Joao Martins
2022-06-01 14:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-01 6:39 ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-31 13:52 ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-31 15:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-31 16:42 ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-01 5:47 ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-01 5:33 ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-27 6:30 ` [PATCH 02/12] iommu/vt-d: Remove for_each_device_domain() Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 15:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-01 8:53 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-27 6:30 ` [PATCH 03/12] iommu/vt-d: Remove clearing translation data in disable_dmar_iommu() Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 15:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-29 5:22 ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-27 6:30 ` [PATCH 04/12] iommu/vt-d: Use pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() in pgtable_walk() Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 15:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-01 8:56 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-27 6:30 ` [PATCH 05/12] iommu/vt-d: Unncessary spinlock for root table alloc and free Lu Baolu
2022-06-01 9:05 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-27 6:30 ` [PATCH 06/12] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in domain ID allocation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-06-01 9:09 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-01 10:38 ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-27 6:30 ` [PATCH 07/12] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in pasid manipulation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-06-01 9:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-01 10:48 ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-27 6:30 ` [PATCH 08/12] iommu/vt-d: Replace spin_lock_irqsave() with spin_lock() Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 6:30 ` [PATCH 09/12] iommu/vt-d: Check device list of domain in domain free path Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 15:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-01 9:28 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-01 11:02 ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-02 6:29 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-06 1:34 ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-27 6:30 ` [PATCH 10/12] iommu/vt-d: Fold __dmar_remove_one_dev_info() into its caller Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 6:30 ` [PATCH 11/12] iommu/vt-d: Use device_domain_lock accurately Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 6:30 ` [PATCH 12/12] iommu/vt-d: Convert device_domain_lock into per-domain mutex Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220530121412.GX1343366@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).