Re: [PATCH v13 net-next 0/9] add support for VSC7512 control over SPI

From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
	"UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
	Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
	"katie.morris@in-advantage.com" <katie.morris@in-advantage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 net-next 0/9] add support for VSC7512 control over SPI
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:08:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220712220856.qbfyhll5o7ygloka@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YszYKLxNyuLdH35Q@COLIN-DESKTOP1.localdomain>

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 07:10:48PM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:21:16AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:51:35 +0100 Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > Can this go into net-next if there are no more complains over the
> > > > weekend? Anyone still planning to review?  
> > > 
> > > As the subsystem with the fewest changes, I'm not sure why it would.
> > 
> > Yeah, just going by the tag in the subject. I have no preference,
> > looks like it applies cleanly to Linus'.
> > 
> > > I'd planed to route this in via MFD and send out a pull-request for
> > > other sub-system maintainers to pull from.
> > > 
> > > If you would like to co-ordinate it instead, you'd be welcome to.
> > > However, I (and probably Linus) would need a succinct immutable branch
> > > to pull from.
> > 
> > Oh, that'd be perfect, sorry, I didn't realize there was already a plan.
> > If you're willing to carry on as intended, please do.
> > 
> > Colin if there is another version please make a note of the above
> > merging plan in the cover letter and drop the net-next tag. 
> > Just in  case my goldfish brain forgets.
> 
> I wasn't sure of the plan, but this makes sense to bring it through MFD.
> Fortunately there's enough work for me on the DSA front that there's no
> way that'll land before this merge window - so I have no objection to it
> going any non-net-next path.
> 
> I'll look to Lee as to whether there should be a v14 with the header
> guard addition per Vladimir's review, or whether that should be in a
> future patch set. I'm happy to go either way.

From my side, the changes to this patch set can be incremental, I'd be
happy if Lee would take them as is.