From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C41AC433EF for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 22:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229635AbiGMW4g (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 18:56:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50322 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229478AbiGMW4b (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 18:56:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A88894F67B for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id fz10so512841pjb.2 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:56:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ALmsjo20iDq07XHHp8hpMGpJ3WDhp0g9JmzUyOXBoCM=; b=JHtzZWeUscDe/NjfuYFmLnY1UjC/BzmUB4H+A2+N3HrOgtyNPI0iG5FaA1VaXxybCp mHZVBAhRW9cXndUaawFFIXstvQ6oojNbyZmEvvWPXCd9nxggREDJlDVQk+1aDN6Bq5Vc Ej/MBMxV71S3F1TZqh5POlcnQRkVcg6haDsv8est59YY8SzzTsQEZ9rFPxnY6oZMZI7O maJ4x/HoxSBZbupP2IkXd0WPHa3PWS4JfuyMJmxl6x0iu+xHWGSQZh4CSHlQZsBQJdlS stuDk4v/KIZv1gMLII6nxGLnx8L4iAWUr68vzt/G9+pQfpsQHTZW/UWyEQwZfXthBpVf q/wA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ALmsjo20iDq07XHHp8hpMGpJ3WDhp0g9JmzUyOXBoCM=; b=5yClwImjWvgq3QGW9QBfQKfd6P0HFd/twkIz42tWTcD4coNW1q5FWagaCuJgWObWbj RpJv4/09+a4HjdoZEzNn4/8w4YjaBIURoepV4WPwLCVNvmJ9zRrU2CNfTkPjXoedkBV6 K+TrVXI6v1+oK3IQ9ZC5/kIpSpx4qlu7pEVAf0Tds6t4UONC26Kq9usqWoIen1HBu6PD plbv6JZMeYy8+7lMbLOKB3KzErW0pV7Cv7sRF+mVcd5VI5YqqrtDIaRkpjxR0oCvP1S5 aQucZcZ18tPAKhCvEXxCqJ3V60V0MX9I6UJPst4HK3YZAdF52xmkv3ntfZvzZgCSCMcx a4Xg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+2GHt3wzycOk4+4hswtTkPPXgvG7NF85KekV7KTx/DpR9t0bNF tQr7lV8Bx6ZCKFpYP6rZyCA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ssTP6Thy3UB20epNnuCWSDPBTNSUJXlSgGX6sg8IBzM8ZlJakJTn9/vCXGS5PpybokpfWpXA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:590e:b0:1f0:1dd9:bf6c with SMTP id k14-20020a17090a590e00b001f01dd9bf6cmr6148501pji.15.1657752989217; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y20-20020aa79af4000000b00518764d09cdsm59039pfp.164.2022.07.13.15.56.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:56:27 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Sudip Mukherjee Cc: Linus Torvalds , "Russell King (Oracle)" , Harry Wentland , Leo Li , Alex Deucher , Balbir Singh , Daniel Axtens , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Kefeng Wang , Linux Kernel Mailing List , amd-gfx list Subject: Re: Linux 5.19-rc6 Message-ID: <20220713225627.GC32544@roeck-us.net> References: <20220713050724.GA2471738@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:50:06PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:45 PM Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 2:36 PM Sudip Mukherjee > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220524025139.40212-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/ > > > > > > > > That patch looks sane to me, but I guess Guenter would need to check > > > > > > I still see the failure in my builds with this patch. But surprisingly > > > I dont see the build failure (with or without this patch) with gcc-12, > > > only with gcc-11. > > > > Arrghs. "build failure"? > > Uhh.. no, sorry.. I meant the same problem which Guenter reported with > powerpc64-linux-ld, hard float and soft float. > But I dont see this problem with gcc-12, only with gcc-11. > Weird. It works for me with gcc 11.3.0 / binutils 2.38 as well as with gcc 11.2.0 / binutils 2.36.1. Guenter