From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8873FC43334 for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 21:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232151AbiGQVEt (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:04:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42588 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229573AbiGQVEr (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:04:47 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE1B12742; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 14:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 26HKuGbt017693; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 15:56:16 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 26HKuFnK017690; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 15:56:15 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 15:56:15 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Kees Cook , linuxppc-dev , linux-kernel , linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mainline build failure of powerpc allmodconfig for prom_init_check Message-ID: <20220717205615.GC25951@gate.crashing.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 01:29:07PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 1:25 PM Sudip Mukherjee > wrote: > > > > And the generated assembly still has the memset for "struct prom_args". > > Strange. That smells like a compiler bug to me. > > But I can't read powerpc assembly code - it's been too many years, and > even back when I did read it I hated how the register "names" worked. > > Maybe it was never the args array, and it was about the other fields. > Not that that makes any sense either, but it makes more sense than the > compiler turning a series of volatile accesses into a memset. Calling mem* on a volatile object (or a struct containing one) is not valid. I opened gcc.gnu.org/PR106335. Thanks for bringing this up! Segher