linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Nicolas Saenz Julienne" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Cyril Brulebois" <kibi@debian.org>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
	"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI: brcmstb: Split brcm_pcie_setup() into two funcs
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:14:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220718181425.GA1431580@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220716222454.29914-3-jim2101024@gmail.com>

On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 06:24:49PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> Currently, the function does the setup for establishing PCIe link-up
> with the downstream device, and it does the actual link-up as well.
> The calling sequence is (roughly) the following in the probe:
> 
> -> brcm_pcie_probe()
>     -> brcm_pcie_setup();                       /* Set-up and link-up */
>     -> pci_host_probe(bridge);
> 
> This commit splits the setup function in two: brcm_pcie_setup(), which only
> does the set-up, and brcm_pcie_start_link(), which only does the link-up.
> The reason why we are doing this is to lay a foundation for subsequent
> commits so that we can turn on any power regulators, as described in the
> root port's DT node, prior to doing link-up.

All drivers that care about power regulators turn them on before
link-up, but typically those regulators are described directly under
the host bridge itself.

IIUC the difference here is that you have regulators described under
Root Ports (not the host bridge/Root Complex itself), so you don't
know about them until you've enumerated the Root Ports.
brcm_pcie_probe() can't turn them on directly because it doesn't know
what Root Ports are present and doesn't know about regulators below
them.

So I think brcm_pcie_setup() does initialization that doesn't depend
on the link or any downstream devices, and brcm_pcie_start_link() does
things that depend on the link being up.  Right?

If so, "start_link" might be a slight misnomer since AFAICT
brcm_pcie_start_link() doesn't do anything to initiate link-up except
maybe deasserting fundamental reset.  Some drivers start the LTSSM or
explicitly enable link training, but brcm_pcie_start_link() doesn't
seem to do anything like that.

brcm_pcie_start_link() still does brcm_pcie_set_outbound_win().  Does
that really depend on the link being up?  If that only affects the
Root Port, maybe it could be done before link-up?

> We do this by defining an
> add_bus() callback which is invoked during enumeraion.  At the end of this
> patchset the probe function trace will look something like this:
> 
> -> brcm_pcie_probe()
>     -> brcm_pcie_setup();                       /* Set-up only */
>     -> pci_host_probe(bridge);
>         -> [enumeration]
>             -> pci_alloc_child_bus()
>                 -> bus->ops->add_bus(bus);      /* We've set this op */
>                 -> brcm_pcie_add_bus()          /* Our callback      */
>                      -> [turn on regulators]    /* Main objective!   */
>                      -> brcm_pcie_start_link()  /* Link-up           */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-18 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-16 22:24 [PATCH v2 0/6] PCI: brcmstb: Re-submit reverted patchset Jim Quinlan
2022-07-16 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] PCI: brcmstb: Remove unnecessary forward declarations Jim Quinlan
2022-07-16 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI: brcmstb: Split brcm_pcie_setup() into two funcs Jim Quinlan
2022-07-18 13:11   ` Pali Rohár
2022-07-18 13:37     ` Jim Quinlan
2022-07-18 17:05       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-18 18:01         ` Pali Rohár
2022-07-18 18:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-07-18 18:56     ` Jim Quinlan
2022-07-18 19:23       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-18 22:40       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-19 13:08         ` Jim Quinlan
2022-07-19 20:03           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-20 14:53             ` Jim Quinlan
2022-07-20 16:18               ` Rob Herring
2022-07-20 21:34                 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-07-21 14:27                   ` Rob Herring
2022-07-18 22:40     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-20 20:37       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-21 14:56         ` Jim Quinlan
2022-07-21 16:10           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-16 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] PCI: brcmstb: Add "refusal mode" to preclude PCIe-induced CPU aborts Jim Quinlan
2022-07-20 22:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-21 14:53     ` Jim Quinlan
2022-07-21 15:46       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-20 22:08   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-16 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] PCI: brcmstb: Add mechanism to turn on subdev regulators Jim Quinlan
2022-07-16 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] PCI: brcmstb: Add control of subdevice voltage regulators Jim Quinlan
2022-07-16 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] PCI: brcmstb: Do not turn off WOL regulators on suspend Jim Quinlan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220718181425.GA1431580@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jim2101024@gmail.com \
    --cc=kibi@debian.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).