[PATCH 4.19 42/62] dlm: fix pending remove if msg allocation fails

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit ba58995909b5098ca4003af65b0ccd5a8d13dd25 ]

This patch unsets ls_remove_len and ls_remove_name if a message
allocation of a remove messages fails. In this case we never send a
remove message out but set the per ls ls_remove_len ls_remove_name
variable for a pending remove. Unset those variable should indicate
possible waiters in wait_pending_remove() that no pending remove is
going on at this moment.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/dlm/lock.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index ac53403e9edb..35bfb681bf13 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -4069,13 +4069,14 @@ static void send_repeat_remove(struct dlm_ls *ls, char *ms_name, int len)
 	rv = _create_message(ls, sizeof(struct dlm_message) + len,
 			     dir_nodeid, DLM_MSG_REMOVE, &ms, &mh);
 	if (rv)
-		return;
+		goto out;
 
 	memcpy(ms->m_extra, name, len);
 	ms->m_hash = hash;
 
 	send_message(mh, ms);
 
+out:
 	spin_lock(&ls->ls_remove_spin);
 	ls->ls_remove_len = 0;
 	memset(ls->ls_remove_name, 0, DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN);
-- 
2.35.1