linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move clocks to CPU node
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 08:07:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220801023756.76jswkbwivuntqof@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220718015742.uwskqo55qd67jx2w@vireshk-i7>

On 18-07-22, 07:27, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The OPP tables, which are part of the CPU nodes, mentions clock rates.
> Are these values for the cxo/gpll clocks or the clock that reaches the
> CPUs? I believe the latter. The DT is not really complete if the CPU
> node mentions the frequency, but not the source clock. It works for
> you because you don't want to do clk_set_rate() in this case, but then
> it leaves other frameworks, like OPP, confused and rightly so.
> 
> Normally, there is always a difference in what the OPP table contains
> as frequency value and what the hardware programs, mostly it is small
> though. It shouldn't prevent us from having the hierarchy clearly
> defined in the DT.
> 
> Based on your description, I think it would be better to make
> cpufreq-hw a clock provider and CPUs the consumer of it. It would then
> allow the OPP core to not carry the hack to make it all work.

Bjorn / Mani,

Can we please get this sorted out ? I don't want to carry an unnecessary hack in
the OPP core for this.

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-01  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-13  6:52 [RFC PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move clocks to CPU node Viresh Kumar
2022-07-13  6:52 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Move clocks to CPU nodes Viresh Kumar
2022-07-18 20:46   ` Rob Herring
2022-07-19  4:19     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-07-13  6:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: " Viresh Kumar
2022-07-13  6:52 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-hw: Clocks are moved " Viresh Kumar
2022-07-13  6:52 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-hw: Register config_clks helper Viresh Kumar
2022-07-15 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move clocks to CPU node Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-07-18  1:57   ` Viresh Kumar
2022-08-01  2:37     ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2022-08-01  5:42       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-08-30  3:24       ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-08-30  5:40         ` Viresh Kumar
2022-08-30  6:20           ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-09-20 10:28             ` Viresh Kumar
2022-09-26 11:34               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220801023756.76jswkbwivuntqof@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).