linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/8] workqueue: Set PF_NO_SETAFFINITY instead of kthread_bind_mask()
Date: Thu,  4 Aug 2022 16:41:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220804084135.92425-4-jiangshanlai@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220804084135.92425-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>

From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>

kthread_bind_mask() can't work correctly if spurious wakeup
happens before kthread_bind_mask().

And a spuriously wakeup worker's cpumask can be possibly changed
by a userspace if worker_attach_to_pool() is called earlier than
kthread_bind_mask().

To avoid the problem caused by spurious wokeup, set PF_NO_SETAFFINITY
at the starting of workers where kthread_bind_mask() can't be used
and luckily workqueue code binds cpumask by itself, all it needs is
only PF_NO_SETAFFINITY.

Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Cc: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index f5b12c6778cc..82937c0fb21f 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1958,7 +1958,6 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
 		goto fail;
 
 	set_user_nice(worker->task, pool->attrs->nice);
-	kthread_bind_mask(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask);
 
 	/* start the newly created worker */
 	wake_up_process(worker->task);
@@ -2380,6 +2379,8 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__worker)
 	struct worker *worker = __worker;
 	struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
 
+	current->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
+
 	/* attach the worker to the pool */
 	worker_attach_to_pool(worker, pool);
 
@@ -2494,6 +2495,7 @@ static int rescuer_thread(void *__rescuer)
 	struct list_head *scheduled = &rescuer->scheduled;
 	bool should_stop;
 
+	current->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
 	set_user_nice(current, RESCUER_NICE_LEVEL);
 
 	/*
@@ -4279,7 +4281,6 @@ static int init_rescuer(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	}
 
 	wq->rescuer = rescuer;
-	kthread_bind_mask(rescuer->task, cpu_possible_mask);
 	wake_up_process(rescuer->task);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-04  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-04  8:41 [RFC PATCH 0/8] workqueue: Fix for prematurely wakeups and cleanups Lai Jiangshan
2022-08-04  8:41 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] workqueue: Unconditionally set cpumask in worker_attach_to_pool() Lai Jiangshan
2022-08-16 21:18   ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-18 14:39     ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-09-12  7:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-04  8:41 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] workqueue: Make create_worker() safe against prematurely wakeups Lai Jiangshan
     [not found]   ` <20220804123520.1660-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-08-05  2:30     ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-08-16 21:46   ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-04  8:41 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2022-08-04  8:41 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] workqueue: Set/Clear PF_WQ_WORKER while attaching/detaching Lai Jiangshan
2022-08-04  8:41 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] workqueue: Use worker_set_flags() in worker_enter_idle() Lai Jiangshan
2022-08-04  8:41 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] workqueue: Simplify the starting of the newly created worker Lai Jiangshan
2022-08-04  8:41 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] workqueue: Remove the outer loop in maybe_create_worker() Lai Jiangshan
2022-08-16 22:08   ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-18 14:44     ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-08-19 17:29       ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-04  8:41 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] workqueue: Move the locking out of maybe_create_worker() Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220804084135.92425-4-jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --to=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wedsonaf@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).