From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"apopple@nvidia.com" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"linmiaohe@huawei.com" <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"songmuchun@bytedance.com" <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
"naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev" <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>,
"alex.sierra@amd.com" <alex.sierra@amd.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on following huge page
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:57:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220818135717.609eef8a@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220818135149.7b043a58@thinkpad>
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:51:49 +0200
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 22:43:22 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 03:31:37 +0000 "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > }
> > > >
> > > > I would be better to fix this for real at those three client code sites?
> > >
> > > Then 5.19 will break for a while to wait for the final BIG patch ?
> >
> > If that's the proposal then your [1/2] should have had a cc:stable and
> > changelog words describing the plan for 6.0.
> >
> > But before we do that I'd like to see at least a prototype of the final
> > fixes to s390 and hugetlb, so we can assess those as preferable for
> > backporting. I don't think they'll be terribly intrusive or risky?
> >
>
> The private follow_huge_pud() for s390 is just some leftover, and the
> only reason is / was that the generic version was using pte_page()
> instead of pud_page(), which would not work for s390. See also commit
> 97534127012f ("mm/hugetlb: use pmd_page() in follow_huge_pmd()").
>
> Since commit 3a194f3f8ad01 ("mm/hugetlb: make pud_huge() and
> follow_huge_pud() aware of non-present pud entry") made
> follow_huge_pud() behave similar to follow_huge_pmd(), in particular
> also adding pud_page(), we can now switch to the generic version.
>
> Note that we cannot support migration / hwpoison for hugetlb or THP,
> because of different layout for PTE and PMD/PUD on s390. The generic
> swp_entry functions all require proper PTEs, which wouldn't work on
> PMD/PUD entries. In theory, at least for hugetlb, due to the "fake
> PTE" conversion logic in huge_ptep_get(), we might be able to also
> fake swp_entries, but the other problem is that we do not have enough
> free bits in the PMD/PUD, so there probably will never be migration
> support for huge pages on s390.
>
> Anyway, that should not matter wrt to switching to the generic
> follow_huge_pud(), because is_hugetlb_entry_migration() should always
> return false, and no special change to pud_huge() check should be
> needed like on x86.
From ce0150cd6f80425c702ccdc4cd8a511c47e99b67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:19:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] s390/hugetlb: switch to generic version of follow_huge_pud()
When pud-sized hugepages were introduced for s390, the generic version
of follow_huge_pud() was using pte_page() instead of pud_page(). This
would be wrong for s390, see also commit 97534127012f ("mm/hugetlb: use
pmd_page() in follow_huge_pmd()"). Therefore, and probably because not
all archs were supporting pud_page() at that time, a private version of
follow_huge_pud() was added for s390, correctly using pud_page().
Since commit 3a194f3f8ad01 ("mm/hugetlb: make pud_huge() and
follow_huge_pud() aware of non-present pud entry"), the generic version
of follow_huge_pud() is now also using pud_page(), and in general
behaves similar to follow_huge_pmd().
Therefore we can now switch to the generic version and get rid of the
s390-specific follow_huge_pud().
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c
index 10e51ef9c79a..c299a18273ff 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c
@@ -237,16 +237,6 @@ int pud_huge(pud_t pud)
return pud_large(pud);
}
-struct page *
-follow_huge_pud(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
- pud_t *pud, int flags)
-{
- if (flags & FOLL_GET)
- return NULL;
-
- return pud_page(*pud) + ((address & ~PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-}
-
bool __init arch_hugetlb_valid_size(unsigned long size)
{
if (MACHINE_HAS_EDAT1 && size == PMD_SIZE)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-18 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-12 8:49 [PATCH v1] mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on following huge page Haiyue Wang
2022-08-13 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2022-08-14 6:20 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-14 6:49 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-14 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] fix follow_page related issues Haiyue Wang
2022-08-14 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: revert handling Non-LRU pages returned by follow_page Haiyue Wang
2022-08-14 16:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-15 1:02 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-14 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on following huge page Haiyue Wang
2022-08-14 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: handling Non-LRU pages returned by follow_page Haiyue Wang
2022-08-14 16:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-15 1:03 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-15 1:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] fix follow_page related issues Haiyue Wang
2022-08-15 1:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on following huge page Haiyue Wang
2022-08-15 1:59 ` Huang, Ying
2022-08-15 2:10 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-15 2:15 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-15 2:51 ` Huang, Ying
2022-08-15 1:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: fix the handling Non-LRU pages returned by follow_page Haiyue Wang
2022-08-15 1:39 ` Huang, Ying
2022-08-15 1:46 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-15 1:59 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] fix follow_page related issues Haiyue Wang
2022-08-15 1:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on following huge page Haiyue Wang
2022-08-15 4:28 ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-15 4:40 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-15 5:16 ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-15 5:20 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-15 5:35 ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-15 5:37 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-15 1:59 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: fix the handling Non-LRU pages returned by follow_page Haiyue Wang
2022-08-15 7:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] fix follow_page related issues Haiyue Wang
2022-08-15 7:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on following huge page Haiyue Wang
2022-08-15 7:40 ` Huang, Ying
2022-08-15 7:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] mm: fix the handling Non-LRU pages returned by follow_page Haiyue Wang
2022-08-15 7:50 ` Huang, Ying
2022-08-15 14:28 ` Felix Kuehling
2022-08-16 0:00 ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-16 1:12 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-16 2:45 ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-16 2:20 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] fix follow_page related issues Haiyue Wang
2022-08-16 2:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on following huge page Haiyue Wang
2022-08-16 8:54 ` Baolin Wang
2022-08-17 0:58 ` Andrew Morton
2022-08-17 3:31 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-17 5:43 ` Andrew Morton
2022-08-17 5:47 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-17 17:26 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-17 21:58 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-18 0:32 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-19 11:22 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-08-19 16:55 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-26 13:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-08-18 11:51 ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-08-18 11:57 ` Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2022-08-17 2:12 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 2:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] mm: fix the handling Non-LRU pages returned by follow_page Haiyue Wang
2022-08-16 4:42 ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-17 2:34 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-23 10:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-23 13:26 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-08-23 13:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-23 13:29 ` Wang, Haiyue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220818135717.609eef8a@thinkpad \
--to=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.sierra@amd.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).