From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA34C433FE for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232165AbiKDP4E (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:56:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59930 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231892AbiKDPzc (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:55:32 -0400 Received: from mail-oa1-f46.google.com (mail-oa1-f46.google.com [209.85.160.46]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D57AF3054E; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 08:55:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-13c2cfd1126so5952937fac.10; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 08:55:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fY5WLVvBtjin9otYHyxvqw7D/OBaUkyJnRUdtIxFHiA=; b=uKl75G2/ALgUHuuVauw34T6B26XDrA4Hc4ffk66G9mvUPagq94KuCiTTnRBUVUwboG JAkgmMSzFBMNZ1Jk1TL2QHw8WGkb0V3YM41Y/gP1tYgLnO1xHsVxwXJMe/QkjFf4LqOQ /AYteq5oLMm4BcaHRBfkSan/OIvV2b/sX/ZGiPPxrpbknoqx52t0q7uw2HoWbucTIcxt zy3PXDK5thX2w+83wTIKbcOvF6I7iVnr5jB2jwVZMzkFQGNbxwk8tB9YFgrugs4eN5kf 9qXYvS1CfYrYCh3e2i/6itx0rTOc9Iw2YnizV0+ADvlQkbHNM69FcujavvLI1FE8Rsdo UNrg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf04ts7cAa9vUii4OlnXJe+PiHlvZ9Jooer0hYRd6sECYRkLdwYC It87WKN7H6kj/8pb9lM0ww== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4hNP3YtD1AjfgdVy7Wwt0avfUZHLw8qObIfSKL9fYTqIcOZIAAguh8sEaoNEPCMLo5eWKqXA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:20c:b0:13c:12cf:1fee with SMTP id t12-20020a056871020c00b0013c12cf1feemr22484223oad.120.1667577329944; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 08:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robh_at_kernel.org (66-90-144-107.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.144.107]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p36-20020a05687056a400b0013b1301ce42sm1871096oao.47.2022.11.04.08.55.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Nov 2022 08:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 1880424 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 04 Nov 2022 15:55:18 -0000 From: Rob Herring Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 10:55:08 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v3 8/8] perf: arm_spe: Add support for SPEv1.2 inverted event filtering MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20220825-arm-spe-v8-7-v3-8-87682f78caac@kernel.org> References: <20220825-arm-spe-v8-7-v3-0-87682f78caac@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20220825-arm-spe-v8-7-v3-0-87682f78caac@kernel.org> To: Namhyung Kim , Will Deacon , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Peter Zijlstra , Alexander Shishkin , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Ingo Molnar , Suzuki K Poulose , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Clark , Mark Brown , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailer: b4 0.11.0-dev Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arm SPEv1.2 (Arm v8.7/v9.2) adds a new feature called Inverted Event Filter which excludes samples matching the event filter. The feature mirrors the existing event filter in PMSEVFR_EL1 adding a new register, PMSNEVFR_EL1, which has the same event bit assignments. Tested-by: James Clark Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- v3: - No change v2: - Update for auto generated register defines - Avoid accessing SYS_PMSNEVFR_EL1 on < v8.7 --- drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c index 82f67e941bc4..573db4211acd 100644 --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu { #define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ARCH_INST (1UL << 3) #define SPE_PMU_FEAT_LDS (1UL << 4) #define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ERND (1UL << 5) +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT (1UL << 6) #define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED (1UL << 63) u64 features; @@ -202,6 +203,10 @@ static const struct attribute_group arm_spe_pmu_cap_group = { #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_min_latency_LO 0 #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_min_latency_HI 11 +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_inv_event_filter_CFG config3 /* PMSNEVFR_EL1 */ +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_inv_event_filter_LO 0 +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_inv_event_filter_HI 63 + /* Why does everything I do descend into this? */ #define __GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(cfg, lo, hi) \ (lo) == (hi) ? #cfg ":" #lo "\n" : #cfg ":" #lo "-" #hi @@ -232,6 +237,7 @@ GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(branch_filter); GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(load_filter); GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(store_filter); GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event_filter); +GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(inv_event_filter); GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(min_latency); static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr[] = { @@ -243,12 +249,27 @@ static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr[] = { &format_attr_load_filter.attr, &format_attr_store_filter.attr, &format_attr_event_filter.attr, + &format_attr_inv_event_filter.attr, &format_attr_min_latency.attr, NULL, }; +static umode_t arm_spe_pmu_format_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, + struct attribute *attr, + int unused) + { + struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj); + struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + if (attr == &format_attr_inv_event_filter.attr && !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT)) + return 0; + + return attr->mode; +} + static const struct attribute_group arm_spe_pmu_format_group = { .name = "format", + .is_visible = arm_spe_pmu_format_attr_is_visible, .attrs = arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr, }; @@ -343,6 +364,9 @@ static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmsfcr(struct perf_event *event) if (ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, event_filter)) reg |= PMSFCR_EL1_FE; + if (ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, inv_event_filter)) + reg |= PMSFCR_EL1_FnE; + if (ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, min_latency)) reg |= PMSFCR_EL1_FL; @@ -355,6 +379,12 @@ static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(struct perf_event *event) return ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, event_filter); } +static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmsnevfr(struct perf_event *event) +{ + struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr; + return ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, inv_event_filter); +} + static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmslatfr(struct perf_event *event) { struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr; @@ -703,6 +733,9 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event) if (arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(event) & arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0(spe_pmu->pmsver)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; + if (arm_spe_event_to_pmsnevfr(event) & arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0(spe_pmu->pmsver)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + if (attr->exclude_idle) return -EOPNOTSUPP; @@ -721,6 +754,10 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event) !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; + if ((FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_FnE, reg)) && + !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + if ((FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_FT, reg)) && !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; @@ -756,6 +793,11 @@ static void arm_spe_pmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags) reg = arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(event); write_sysreg_s(reg, SYS_PMSEVFR_EL1); + if (spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT) { + reg = arm_spe_event_to_pmsnevfr(event); + write_sysreg_s(reg, SYS_PMSNEVFR_EL1); + } + reg = arm_spe_event_to_pmslatfr(event); write_sysreg_s(reg, SYS_PMSLATFR_EL1); @@ -990,6 +1032,9 @@ static void __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe(void *info) if (FIELD_GET(PMSIDR_EL1_FE, reg)) spe_pmu->features |= SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT; + if (FIELD_GET(PMSIDR_EL1_FnE, reg)) + spe_pmu->features |= SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT; + if (FIELD_GET(PMSIDR_EL1_FT, reg)) spe_pmu->features |= SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP; -- b4 0.11.0-dev