linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary check with CONFIG_RETHUNK
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 00:22:27 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220908002227.528154f5aaef62719a234e8e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yxiqb+QkSQeAPzJw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 16:27:59 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 11:14:50PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 15:05:13 +0200
> > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 10:02:41AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 	struct queue q;
> > > > 
> > > > 	start = paddr - offset;
> > > > 	end = start + size;
> > > > 	push(&q, paddr - offset);
> > > > 
> > > > 	while (start = pop(&q)) {
> > > > 		for_each_insn(&insn, start, end, buf) {
> > > > 			if (insn.kaddr == paddr)
> > > > 				return 1;
> > > > 
> > > > 			target = insn_get_branch_addr(&insn);
> > > > 			if (target)
> > > > 				push(&q, target);
> > > > 
> > > > 			if (dead_end_insn(&insn))
> > > > 				break;
> > > > 		}
> > > > 	}
> > > 
> > > There is the very rare case of intra-function-calls; but I *think*
> > > they're all in noinstr/nokprobe code anyway.
> > > 
> > > For instance we have RSB stuffing code like:
> > > 
> > > 	.rept 16
> > > 	call 1f;
> > > 	int3
> > > 	1:
> > > 	.endr
> > > 	add $(BITS_PER_LONG/8) * 16, %_ASM_SP
> > > 
> > > And the proposed will be horribly confused by that. But like said; it
> > > should also never try and untangle it.
> > 
> > Yeah, but I guess if we break the decoding (internal) loop when we
> > hit an INT3, it maybe possible to be handled?
> 
> If you make insn_get_branch_addr() return the target of CALL
> instructions when this target is between function start and end, it
> should work I think.

Ah Indeed. Anyway, I would like to use INT3 as a stop instruction,
instread of checking dead_end_instruction. Is there any problem?

> 
> But like said; this construct is rare and all instances I can remember
> should not be kprobes to begin with. These are all 'fun' things like
> retpoline stubs and the the above RSB stuff loop.

Agree. That should not appear on normal code.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-07 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-07  0:55 [PATCH 0/2] x86/kprobes: Fixes for CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-07  0:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary check with CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-07  7:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  9:01     ` [PATCH] objtool,x86: Teach decode about LOOP* instructions Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  9:06       ` David Laight
2022-09-07  9:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 11:13           ` David Laight
2022-09-15 14:24       ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  9:12     ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary check with CONFIG_RETHUNK Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07  9:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  9:53         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07  8:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  8:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  9:49     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 10:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 11:44         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 13:05     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 14:14       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 14:27         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 15:22           ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2022-09-07 12:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 13:49     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07 14:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 12:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07 13:53     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-09-07  0:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/kprobes: Fix optprobe optimization " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2022-09-07  6:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86/kprobes: Fixes for CONFIG_RETHUNK Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220908002227.528154f5aaef62719a234e8e@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).