From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
"Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 16/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Define a default classification for unclassified tasks
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 16:11:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220909231205.14009-17-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220909231205.14009-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Tasks may be unclassified if they have been recently created, spend most
of its lifetime sleeping, or hardware has not provided a classification.
Most tasks will be eventually classified as 0. This class corresponds to
the capabilities in the legacy, classless, Hardware Feedback Interface
table.
Class 0 is a reasonable choice until hardware provides an actual
classification. Meanwhile, the scheduler will place tasks of higher-
performance classes on higher-performance CPUs.
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c
index 1b6072c828ff..967899d2c01f 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c
@@ -184,6 +184,20 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *hfi_updates_wq;
#define HFI_MAX_THERM_NOTIFY_COUNT 16
#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_THREAD_DIRECTOR
+
+/*
+ * Tasks may be unclassified if they have been recently created, spend most
+ * of its lifetime sleeping, or hardware has not provided a classification.
+ *
+ * Most tasks will be classified as 0 eventually. Meanwhile, the scheduler
+ * will place tasks of higher per-class performance on higher-performance
+ * CPUs.
+ *
+ * Class 0 is a reasonable choice. It matches the performance capability
+ * of the legacy, classless, Hardware Feedback Interface table.
+ */
+#define UNCLASSIFIED_TASK_DEFAULT 0
+
int intel_hfi_has_task_classes(void)
{
return cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ITD);
@@ -222,14 +236,14 @@ int intel_hfi_get_task_class_score(int class, int cpu)
struct hfi_cpu_info *info = &per_cpu(hfi_cpu_info, cpu);
struct hfi_instance *instance;
struct hfi_cpu_data caps;
+ int cap, _class = class;
unsigned long flags;
- int cap;
if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
return -EINVAL;
if (class == TASK_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED)
- return -EINVAL;
+ _class = UNCLASSIFIED_TASK_DEFAULT;
if (class >= (int)hfi_features.nr_classes)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -239,7 +253,7 @@ int intel_hfi_get_task_class_score(int class, int cpu)
return -ENOENT;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&instance->table_lock, flags);
- get_one_hfi_cap(instance, info->index, &caps, class);
+ get_one_hfi_cap(instance, info->index, &caps, _class);
cap = caps.perf_cap;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&instance->table_lock, flags);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-09 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-09 23:11 [RFC PATCH 00/23] sched: Introduce classes of tasks for load balance Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 01/23] sched/task_struct: Introduce classes of tasks Ricardo Neri
2022-09-14 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-16 14:41 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-02 22:32 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 02/23] sched: Add interfaces for " Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 03/23] sched/core: Initialize the class of a new task Ricardo Neri
2022-09-26 14:57 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-26 21:53 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-27 15:48 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-01 20:32 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 04/23] sched/core: Add user_tick as argument to scheduler_tick() Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 05/23] sched/core: Move is_core_idle() out of fair.c Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 06/23] sched/core: Update the classification of the current task Ricardo Neri
2022-09-14 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-16 14:42 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 07/23] sched/fair: Collect load-balancing stats for task classes Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 08/23] sched/fair: Compute task-class performance scores for load balancing Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 9:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-26 3:57 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-26 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-27 3:30 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 09/23] sched/fair: Use task-class performance score to pick the busiest group Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-05 23:38 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-06 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 19:07 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 10/23] sched/fair: Use classes of tasks when selecting a busiest runqueue Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-07 23:36 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 11/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Introduce Hardware Feedback Interface classes Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 12/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Convert table_lock to use flags-handling variants Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-27 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-26 3:59 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-26 3:58 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 13/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add the Intel Thread Director feature definitions Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 14/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Update the class of the current task Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-07 20:34 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 15/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Report per-cpu class-specific performance scores Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-05 23:59 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-06 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 15:05 ` Brown, Len
2022-10-06 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-07 11:20 ` Len Brown
2022-09-09 23:11 ` Ricardo Neri [this message]
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 17/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Enable the Intel Thread Director Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 1:50 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 18/23] sched/task_struct: Add helpers for task classification Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-08 0:38 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 19/23] sched/core: Initialize helpers of " Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 20/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Implement model-specific checks for " Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 21/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add feature bit for HRESET Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 22/23] x86/hreset: Configure history reset Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-02 22:34 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 23/23] x86/process: Reset hardware history in context switch Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-03 23:07 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-06 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 22:55 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 12:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-02 22:02 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 13:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-02 22:12 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-02 22:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-03 19:49 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-03 19:55 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20220910072120.2651-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-09-16 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH 06/23] sched/core: Update the classification of the current task Ricardo Neri
2022-10-11 19:12 ` Trying to apply patch set Carlos Bilbao
2022-10-18 2:31 ` Ricardo Neri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220909231205.14009-17-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).