Hello, On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:12:13AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > \#pwm-cells for the Icicle kit's fabric PWM was incorrectly set to 2 & > blindly overridden by the (out of tree) driver anyway. The core can > support inverted operation, so update the entry to correctly report its > capabilities. > > Fixes: 72560c6559b8 ("riscv: dts: microchip: add fpga fabric section to icicle kit") > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley > --- > arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi > index 0d28858b83f2..e09a13aef268 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ core_pwm0: pwm@41000000 { > compatible = "microchip,corepwm-rtl-v4"; > reg = <0x0 0x41000000 0x0 0xF0>; > microchip,sync-update-mask = /bits/ 32 <0>; > - #pwm-cells = <2>; > + #pwm-cells = <3>; > clocks = <&fabric_clk3>; > status = "disabled"; > }; there are no phandles on that PWM, so there is nothing that needs a followup adaption. Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |