From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80A3C54EE9 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 04:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229552AbiISEHA (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:07:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45966 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229483AbiISEG5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:06:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA07FAE45 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id t190so2598691pgd.9 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:06:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=SKc7ienc320bxaSqnsDwmqqYkrQ1W8qMLxdfUMOcQck=; b=DECwdbcvfv16bsFM6nQM3ZpFsiauW9Lcnmm7X25+4NjijLsN0W7qZnWHpH30YQd8+E jPfWmJthrHrMEIlMUM2Eci3dKz9BqZMkG1smGXBsb2WX0NWTjlKivSaVWwjeEZRzh4YR KZNYjOj/iyZ7hL8ehQ9Y2R+bETbPoJ8KgYhzeHtgKyBhKc6ufsu5pa1bCyK/Xqiu7KUI 48K/om1UZh+qzvEA4J8Rouun5he6FIZkaY4YPy1V5epuH0VM23cq8tgfSvZ6NTeBBkeJ 0QLfGLEOyX7HSZd4yzZ2Gg5t+JU+c0Mc635qpX8IkKvfBHuoqfBnYhUs4X+YpILo3JpM 3OZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=SKc7ienc320bxaSqnsDwmqqYkrQ1W8qMLxdfUMOcQck=; b=XMJ9XT4FE3Nu6mR4yyhHhAohQI9RLIaPPuo4YEm3WjCHE8iedVatWBrNhNonSSi3r3 Jb65LPzXsYuX/GVhJa3GKjDKUsQfRFmzgPrwYgdySlgWY5O7lw8fpg9ZA1pnGSxRLfyq liEkZ44puQUjpPngB5c721CeIDgTvLUZZh/7YcoyUjxrrrShw+U8/Y1JqXtmA2LoRJNi Nq5EH7Yzh6PfofLkJkKit85zg+XK2QurqU8Lio1RB4apBr3WKZ/73zNMnmZgvNLJ4C7F 1byjuu9wntmJZnr12Vq9XjeP/VkOS1axzD9l3MCV5TpNx1YlrsBd8guokKmBbcICpnJp 16ZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0pRwn6anUXnQMptVixu94gAnkkC13NIjJwNspU9/Mao8hXo8yG BZxoBfSp59d6h7w1Do1US5c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM607ldQAjae/oC+IOSLwU4EIw4Kh0YWOWFDmzUKOlIanKieGq3odU2ZiCYGog40IJ07068esg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1351:0:b0:439:14a8:87 with SMTP id 17-20020a631351000000b0043914a80087mr14233930pgt.66.1663560416330; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f4-20020a170902ce8400b0016dc6279ab7sm19388796plg.149.2022.09.18.21.06.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:06:53 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , =?iso-8859-1?B?Q3Pza+Fz?= Bence , Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: Linux 6.0-rc6 Message-ID: <20220919040653.GA1840059@roeck-us.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 01:56:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So this is an artificially small -rc release, because this past week > we had the Maintainers' Summit in Dublin (along with OSS EU and LPC > 2022), so we've had a lot of maintainers traveling. > > Or - putting my ridiculously optimistic hat on - maybe things are just > so nice and stable that there just weren't all that many fixes? > > Yeah, I know which scenario I'm betting on, but hope springs eternal. > > Regardless, things look fine. I am expecting rc7 to be larger than > usual due to pull requests having shifted one week later, and in the > worst case that might mean that I might feel like we need an extra > rc8, but for now I'm going to assume it's not going to be _that_ > noticeable and hope we'll just keep to the regular schedule. > > But it would be lovely if everybody gave this some extra tender loving > care in the form of extra testing... > Build results: total: 149 pass: 149 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 490 pass: 489 fail: 1 Failed tests: mcf5208evb:m5208:m5208evb_defconfig:initrd TL;DR: Patches / reverts needed to fix known regressions Revert "net: fec: Use a spinlock to guard `fep->ptp_clk_on`" Revert "fec: Restart PPS after link state change" revert b353b241f1eb revert f79959220fa5 Rationale: The patches result in various tracebacks and crashes. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220827160922.642zlcd5foopozru@pengutronix.de/ The need to revert those patches has been discussed repeatedly, so going into details seems pointless. Guenter