linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, paolo.valente@linaro.org,
	jack@suse.cz, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [patch v11 5/6] block, bfq: cleanup bfq_weights_tree add/remove apis
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:46:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220919084633.nmzastqkjool5jnc@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220916071942.214222-6-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>

On Fri 16-09-22 15:19:41, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> 
> The 'bfq_data' and 'rb_root_cached' can both be accessed through
> 'bfq_queue', thus only pass 'bfq_queue' as parameter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza
> ---
>  block/bfq-iosched.c | 19 +++++++++----------
>  block/bfq-iosched.h | 10 +++-------
>  block/bfq-wf2q.c    | 18 ++++++------------
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index 6d95b0e488a8..4ad4fa0dad4a 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -870,9 +870,9 @@ static bool bfq_asymmetric_scenario(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
>   * In most scenarios, the rate at which nodes are created/destroyed
>   * should be low too.
>   */
> -void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
> -			  struct rb_root_cached *root)
> +void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
>  {
> +	struct rb_root_cached *root = &bfqq->bfqd->queue_weights_tree;
>  	struct bfq_entity *entity = &bfqq->entity;
>  	struct rb_node **new = &(root->rb_root.rb_node), *parent = NULL;
>  	bool leftmost = true;
> @@ -944,13 +944,14 @@ void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
>   * See the comments to the function bfq_weights_tree_add() for considerations
>   * about overhead.
>   */
> -void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
> -			       struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
> -			       struct rb_root_cached *root)
> +void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
>  {
> +	struct rb_root_cached *root;
> +
>  	if (!bfqq->weight_counter)
>  		return;
>  
> +	root = &bfqq->bfqd->queue_weights_tree;
>  	bfqq->weight_counter->num_active--;
>  	if (bfqq->weight_counter->num_active > 0)
>  		goto reset_entity_pointer;
> @@ -967,11 +968,9 @@ void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
>   * Invoke __bfq_weights_tree_remove on bfqq and decrement the number
>   * of active groups for each queue's inactive parent entity.
>   */
> -void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
> -			     struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
> +void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
>  {
> -	__bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq,
> -				  &bfqd->queue_weights_tree);
> +	__bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqq);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -6220,7 +6219,7 @@ static void bfq_completed_request(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd)
>  		bfqq->budget_timeout = jiffies;
>  
>  		bfq_del_bfqq_in_groups_with_pending_reqs(bfqq);
> -		bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq);
> +		bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqq);
>  	}
>  
>  	now_ns = ktime_get_ns();
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h
> index 257acb54c6dc..4bb58ab0c90a 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h
> @@ -973,13 +973,9 @@ struct bfq_queue *bic_to_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync);
>  void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool is_sync);
>  struct bfq_data *bic_to_bfqd(struct bfq_io_cq *bic);
>  void bfq_pos_tree_add_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
> -void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
> -			  struct rb_root_cached *root);
> -void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
> -			       struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
> -			       struct rb_root_cached *root);
> -void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
> -			     struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
> +void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
> +void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
> +void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
>  void bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
>  		     bool compensate, enum bfqq_expiration reason);
>  void bfq_put_queue(struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
> diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> index 5e8224c96921..124aaea6196e 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> @@ -707,7 +707,6 @@ __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio(struct bfq_service_tree *old_st,
>  		struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfq_entity_to_bfqq(entity);
>  		unsigned int prev_weight, new_weight;
>  		struct bfq_data *bfqd = NULL;
> -		struct rb_root_cached *root;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
>  		struct bfq_sched_data *sd;
>  		struct bfq_group *bfqg;
> @@ -770,19 +769,15 @@ __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio(struct bfq_service_tree *old_st,
>  		 * queue, remove the entity from its old weight counter (if
>  		 * there is a counter associated with the entity).
>  		 */
> -		if (prev_weight != new_weight && bfqq) {
> -			root = &bfqd->queue_weights_tree;
> -			__bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq, root);
> -		}
> +		if (prev_weight != new_weight && bfqq)
> +			__bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqq);
>  		entity->weight = new_weight;
>  		/*
>  		 * Add the entity, if it is not a weight-raised queue,
>  		 * to the counter associated with its new weight.
>  		 */
> -		if (prev_weight != new_weight && bfqq && bfqq->wr_coeff == 1) {
> -			/* If we get here, root has been initialized. */
> -			bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqd, bfqq, root);
> -		}
> +		if (prev_weight != new_weight && bfqq && bfqq->wr_coeff == 1)
> +			bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqq);
>  
>  		new_st->wsum += entity->weight;
>  
> @@ -1687,7 +1682,7 @@ void bfq_del_bfqq_busy(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool expiration)
>  		 * Next function is invoked last, because it causes bfqq to be
>  		 * freed. DO NOT use bfqq after the next function invocation.
>  		 */
> -		bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq);
> +		bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqq);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -1708,8 +1703,7 @@ void bfq_add_bfqq_busy(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
>  	if (!bfqq->dispatched) {
>  		bfq_add_bfqq_in_groups_with_pending_reqs(bfqq);
>  		if (bfqq->wr_coeff == 1)
> -			bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqd, bfqq,
> -					     &bfqd->queue_weights_tree);
> +			bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqq);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1)
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-19  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-16  7:19 [patch v11 0/6] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a specail occasion Yu Kuai
2022-09-16  7:19 ` [patch v11 1/6] block, bfq: support to track if bfqq has pending requests Yu Kuai
2022-09-16  7:19 ` [patch v11 2/6] block, bfq: record how many queues have " Yu Kuai
2022-09-16  7:19 ` [patch v11 3/6] block, bfq: refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs' Yu Kuai
2022-09-27 16:32   ` Paolo Valente
2022-09-27 16:33     ` Paolo VALENTE
2022-09-16  7:19 ` [patch v11 4/6] block, bfq: do not idle if only one group is activated Yu Kuai
2022-09-16  7:19 ` [patch v11 5/6] block, bfq: cleanup bfq_weights_tree add/remove apis Yu Kuai
2022-09-19  8:46   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-09-27 16:19     ` Paolo Valente
2022-09-16  7:19 ` [patch v11 6/6] block, bfq: cleanup __bfq_weights_tree_remove() Yu Kuai
2022-09-27 16:38 ` [patch v11 0/6] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a specail occasion Paolo Valente
2022-09-28  1:07   ` Yu Kuai
2022-10-11  8:11   ` Yu Kuai
2022-10-11  8:21     ` Paolo Valente
2022-10-11  9:36       ` Yu Kuai
2022-10-18  4:00         ` Yu Kuai
2022-10-25  6:34           ` Paolo VALENTE
2022-10-25  7:31             ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 11:32 ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-01 13:10 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220919084633.nmzastqkjool5jnc@quack3 \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).