linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: haoxin <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, damon@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/damon/sysfs: use kzmalloc instead kmalloc to simplify codes
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:25:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220920162542.52554-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10f3f03d-e616-0619-cbe1-8515a3d7fc0e@linux.alibaba.com>

Hi Xin,

On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:58:41 +0800 haoxin <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> 
> 在 2022/9/20 上午1:22, SeongJae Park 写道:
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 23:12:01 +0800 Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In damon_sysfs_access_pattern_alloc() adn damon_sysfs_attrs_alloc(),
> >> we can use kzmalloc to alloc instance of the related structs, This makes
> >> the function code much cleaner.
> > This definitely makes the code cleaner, thank you.  But, the initial intent of
> > the code is to initialize the fiedls that really need to be initialized at the
> > point, for the efficiency and also for making it clear which field is needed to
> > be initialized to what value here.  It's also intended to make readers wonder
> > about where and how the remaining fields are initialized.
> 
> Maybe the other func like damon_sysfs_kdamonds_alloc() also need to do 
> like this, you can see it return directly by
> 
> kzalloc.
> 
> static struct damon_sysfs_kdamonds *damon_sysfs_kdamonds_alloc(void)
> {
>              return kzalloc(sizeof(struct damon_sysfs_kdamonds), 
> GFP_KERNEL);
> }

In this case, all the fields of the struct need to be initialized as zero.
That's why we use kzalloc() there.

Of course, my opinion is not a static and concrete rule, but changing mind.
And obviously everyone makes many mistakes and DAMON code has many rooms for
improvement.  I really appreciate for your greatful efforts for that.  But, at
least in this case, I think it doesn't really need the change at the moment,
IMHO.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-20 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-19 15:12 [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/damon/sysfs: remove unnecessary variables Xin Hao
2022-09-19 15:12 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/damon/sysfs: use kzmalloc instead kmalloc to simplify codes Xin Hao
2022-09-19 17:22   ` SeongJae Park
2022-09-20  1:58     ` haoxin
2022-09-20 16:25       ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2022-09-21  5:20         ` haoxin
2022-09-19 17:03 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/damon/sysfs: remove unnecessary variables SeongJae Park
2022-09-20  1:54   ` haoxin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220920162542.52554-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).