From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: jianghaoran <jianghaoran@kylinos.cn>
Cc: vinicius.gomes@intel.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] taprio: Set the value of picos_per_byte before fill sched_entry
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 19:18:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220929191815.51362581@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220928065830.1544954-1-jianghaoran@kylinos.cn>
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:58:30 +0800 jianghaoran wrote:
> If the value of picos_per_byte is set after fill sched_entry,
> as a result, the min_duration calculated by length_to_duration is 0,
> and the validity of the input interval cannot be judged,
> too small intervals couldn't allow any packet to be transmitted.
Meaning an invalid configuration is accepted but no packets
can ever be transmitted? Could you make the user-visible
issue clearer?
> It will appear like commit b5b73b26b3ca ("taprio:
> Fix allowing too small intervals") described problem.
> Here is a further modification of this problem.
>
> example:
Here as well it seems worthwhile to mention what this is an example of.
e.g. "example configuration which will not be able to transmit packets"
> tc qdisc replace dev enp5s0f0 parent root handle 100 taprio \
> num_tc 3 \
> map 2 2 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 \
> queues 1@0 1@1 2@2 \
> base-time 1528743495910289987 \
> sched-entry S 01 9 \
> sched-entry S 02 9 \
> sched-entry S 04 9 \
> clockid CLOCK_TAI
Please add a Fixes tag pointing to the first commit where the issue was
present, and CC Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> on the next
version.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-30 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-28 6:58 [PATCH] taprio: Set the value of picos_per_byte before fill sched_entry jianghaoran
2022-09-30 2:18 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-09-30 11:18 ` jianghaoran
2022-09-30 13:46 ` jianghaoran
2022-09-30 13:58 ` test jianghaoran
2022-09-30 14:16 ` [PATCH] taprio: Set the value of picos_per_byte before fill sched_entry jianghaoran
2022-10-01 0:42 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 0:44 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 0:49 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 0:57 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 0:59 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 1:10 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 1:17 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 1:23 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 7:48 ` [PATCH V2] " jianghaoran
2022-10-01 7:51 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 7:51 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 7:53 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 8:00 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 8:06 ` jianghaoran
2022-10-01 11:44 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-10-03 15:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-01 8:29 ` jianghaoran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220929191815.51362581@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jianghaoran@kylinos.cn \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).