From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C25C43217 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229682AbiJKJx0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 05:53:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58152 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229446AbiJKJxY (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 05:53:24 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BEA819283; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 02:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id g27so19317823edf.11; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 02:53:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ELjS81PwjqQiyf5mGAwEzkT1W0HRDMv+5erRjZ7RuLQ=; b=kIoTTB8ZNwOG9w6qq0ZIJ0LPuQeliEpZIELLknmgoAK4NaByX3aFSepOvud7Q5KiAY 93axr1cusG2EFrbH6k1HkgTYoUmZNLGtCrFS08prJJhOxO9jKojNStBQqQHz1+Q0rFo9 hIvxktGgEh6Qnm3kHRLZPpsM2+Bmqik8qRHoggJ/5XIg+IoUisP4T2oW4mli2CLR4xUD Fs0feCX8LbDNbTxsEY38eB7AfBd/udLGb9DrT74MkcfT1Wj91Jly7MpPYqPfXz22sBKV 29htuS//FwNAPt/MVo9ytxr7wduHqbLKI5HsEBsXhJozcwzvFAFY2Ae7cGLQaSYTuOsl zlgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ELjS81PwjqQiyf5mGAwEzkT1W0HRDMv+5erRjZ7RuLQ=; b=T4NAcyufzZ3p0CAXiMHHYyehWl7V/9HDQly+/eX/zCiSQR7SWwJM4OLmr02ASBh22q PPSzsQ2vhRis8+ZNsfkSvwuJMBnnofzen0jzaYC32J5ejhvq7VDIAJwlS4EWGYHxp35O kbApgHXWxZAdFWVWCTbfEdLxFvmLWVHr9Or1ts/c0fdJ0pWlZ/LuqqOIgAn7mXL/iKGQ 7Im0kicZ7cgC44Vxd807etQONEWm5xn1VQ5zF3p80OFihiv0Kv8/mvdKCEYUr6SsLXY6 RHsmuNpktnGSJ27kEeEMK126wRUz/6cUtyQM0R7pzixL3QAIUqkyeiJMchkGc+Yr9bI2 UPvA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf17iqlekbmgCudCyrJqWxsFqJoeU+9hY5xBhC5wCuYH6c01a8Kp e3s+quDnRc7XxADMnt/6BmFIfAMrMG216w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6se43QQMI0lPdusx+BG1o2fymug7qixH9tmxIgEZRUkwg6mZBuwa2NlJ8ZfTHPQSGc6orvMA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1bd0:b0:458:f170:fa74 with SMTP id ch16-20020a0564021bd000b00458f170fa74mr22233281edb.382.1665482001479; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 02:53:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.27.184.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bt6-20020a0564020a4600b00458dda85495sm8903646edb.0.2022.10.11.02.53.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 02:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 12:53:18 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Colin Foster Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Linus Walleij , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Manoil , Lee Jones , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Paolo Abeni , Jakub Kicinski , Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Vivien Didelot , Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 12/14] dt-bindings: net: dsa: ocelot: add ocelot-ext documentation Message-ID: <20221011095318.mqbrk3jrfioiql4x@skbuf> References: <455e31be-dc87-39b3-c7fe-22384959c556@linaro.org> <28b4d9f9-f41a-deca-aa61-26fb65dcc873@linaro.org> <20221008000014.vs2m3vei5la2r2nd@skbuf> <20221010130707.6z63hsl43ipd5run@skbuf> <20221010174856.nd3n4soxk7zbmcm7@skbuf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:47:09AM -0700, Colin Foster wrote: > Thank you for laying this path out for me. Hopefully when I go > heads-down to implement this there won't be any gotchas. It seems pretty > straightforward. > > Maybe my only question would be where to send these patches. If these > can all go through net-next it seems like there'd be no issue when step > 8 (add 7512 documentation) comes along with this current patch set. > > Otherwise this sounds good. I'll switch to getting a patch set of steps > 1-7 as you suggest. I have some doubts whether it would be good to also merge net/dsa/mscc,ocelot.yaml (i.e. the NXP variants) into net/mscc,vsc7514-switch.yaml. A few "if" statements on compatible string which decide the format of "reg" and of "reg-names" should cover the differences. Not sure how the end result will look like.