From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53436C38A2D for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 21:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231403AbiJXVFt (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2022 17:05:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44804 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231510AbiJXVF1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2022 17:05:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE1BA8A7E5 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id b5so9449279pgb.6 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:11:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heitbaum.com; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Na645otuqgn0sXJO+Ctgh/B1ZgCXd78iXx+hl5nXu1k=; b=B6cF93wr5er8lpEPiibQIhfiA5iTuSQwOsYbycEvzRm5gTbln+YVKjSSO9Bgxkgxze O5g44P6rEjEB6HLMh1MwfeUn00POpfsMMKnEoio+P/0tx9iblEx5Mmlz3oFpviyxhvaB vxL29n6DT7QQ94OOLRrwG2aa09K8HXkcgAlU8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Na645otuqgn0sXJO+Ctgh/B1ZgCXd78iXx+hl5nXu1k=; b=NTCKnXt7ho7NdrVk2jvCQlQusuJmPTCPfQ0ru0fUTHZEdfTGsbcKljulM9wkqyqpKq Pq1nmidVJ51D8GmxAM/fpuyfUXv5BB3c2wk93HLN6AJ70240QJ3pgWpQY5w495EhVQmd z98wLfkSdZ+1YThtcITzudIi1Cep223ysC/+gMVlaLedJ/BfL7x9vg1EVpf9nG+uVBuy d25SlKgcEWYg0g1fYhHLGcciw6qrwF5ROrVyTbEd6Z1JYo+PlEuioBHhfCen1199pLcj wUwY2WZi1hCWnfrGnVe3bUFa7NXlLgOdPF0IUePUGMaMY5rMXlGeJELZkCfK9f0R+rnE GxUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1uzCML4oOifqOwLItQLUvARLAULNiFTOf/GBVicmKE/x7zX8sd kwL6KTeViHlKPcAEIxiXHXUwFw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM77llRiQENHd/42c8YhZKxxkM62T3D6oiTY87RRNHDBJWnIzG+PRJs4RSHWRZOIs9e8yFZKpA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:198d:b0:56b:fa7b:56ed with SMTP id d13-20020a056a00198d00b0056bfa7b56edmr3349663pfl.81.1666638623065; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e121e5ee19ec ([220.253.112.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e13-20020a17090301cd00b00186b945c0d1sm99999plh.2.2022.10.24.12.10.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 19:10:15 +0000 From: Rudi Heitbaum To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/20] 6.0.4-rc1 review Message-ID: <20221024191015.GA1811448@e121e5ee19ec> References: <20221024112934.415391158@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221024112934.415391158@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.4 release. > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:29:24 +0000. > Hi Greg, 6.0.4-rc1 tested. Run tested on: - Intel Alder Lake x86_64 (nuc12 i7-1260P) In addition - build tested for: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - Allwinner H6 - NXP iMX6 - NXP iMX8 - Qualcomm Dragonboard - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro - Samsung Exynos5422 Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum -- Rudi