From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699A6ECAAA1 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 19:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229956AbiJ1TeY (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:34:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45616 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229576AbiJ1TeV (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:34:21 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C95C23B6A9; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 12:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 29SJY53e008408; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 21:34:05 +0200 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 21:34:05 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: always rebuild the sysroot when running a test Message-ID: <20221028193405.GA8395@1wt.eu> References: <20221026054508.19634-1-w@1wt.eu> <20221026164825.GN5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20221026195902.GB24197@1wt.eu> <20221026204138.GQ5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20221027023456.GA26215@1wt.eu> <20221027170453.GA5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20221027171307.GA30081@1wt.eu> <20221027182629.GF5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221027182629.GF5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Paul, On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:26:29AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > We'll see, but in any case it would just be a minor detail, but I'll > > give you a quick response so that you don't have to deal with multiple > > versions of the patch, we all know that it's painful. > > If I don't hear otherwise from you by the end of tomorrow (Friday), > Pacific Time, I will rebase those two patches in preparation for sending > a pull request for the regression. I will of course run the pull-message > text past you before sending the pull request. No news on this front, so feel free to pick what you already have. Thank you! Willy