linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Wu <wusamuel@google.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc: Sam Wu <wusamuel@google.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	"Isaac J . Manjarres" <isaacmanjarres@google.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1] Revert "cpufreq: schedutil: Move max CPU capacity to sugov_policy"
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 19:57:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221110195732.1382314-1-wusamuel@google.com> (raw)

This reverts commit 6d5afdc97ea71958287364a1f1d07e59ef151b11.

On a Pixel 6 device, it is observed that this commit increases
latency by approximately 50ms, or 20%, in migrating a task
that requires full CPU utilization from a LITTLE CPU to Fmax
on a big CPU. Reverting this change restores the latency back
to its original baseline value.

Fixes: 6d5afdc97ea7 ("cpufreq: schedutil: Move max CPU capacity to sugov_policy")
Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Wu <wusamuel@google.com>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 9161d1136d01..1207c78f85c1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -25,9 +25,6 @@ struct sugov_policy {
 	unsigned int		next_freq;
 	unsigned int		cached_raw_freq;
 
-	/* max CPU capacity, which is equal for all CPUs in freq. domain */
-	unsigned long		max;
-
 	/* The next fields are only needed if fast switch cannot be used: */
 	struct			irq_work irq_work;
 	struct			kthread_work work;
@@ -51,6 +48,7 @@ struct sugov_cpu {
 
 	unsigned long		util;
 	unsigned long		bw_dl;
+	unsigned long		max;
 
 	/* The field below is for single-CPU policies only: */
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
@@ -160,6 +158,7 @@ static void sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
 
+	sg_cpu->max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(sg_cpu->cpu);
 	sg_cpu->bw_dl = cpu_bw_dl(rq);
 	sg_cpu->util = effective_cpu_util(sg_cpu->cpu, cpu_util_cfs(sg_cpu->cpu),
 					  FREQUENCY_UTIL, NULL);
@@ -254,7 +253,6 @@ static void sugov_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
  */
 static void sugov_iowait_apply(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
 {
-	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = sg_cpu->sg_policy;
 	unsigned long boost;
 
 	/* No boost currently required */
@@ -282,8 +280,7 @@ static void sugov_iowait_apply(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
 	 * sg_cpu->util is already in capacity scale; convert iowait_boost
 	 * into the same scale so we can compare.
 	 */
-	boost = sg_cpu->iowait_boost * sg_policy->max;
-	boost >>= SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
+	boost = (sg_cpu->iowait_boost * sg_cpu->max) >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
 	boost = uclamp_rq_util_with(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu), boost, NULL);
 	if (sg_cpu->util < boost)
 		sg_cpu->util = boost;
@@ -340,7 +337,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single_freq(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 	if (!sugov_update_single_common(sg_cpu, time, flags))
 		return;
 
-	next_f = get_next_freq(sg_policy, sg_cpu->util, sg_policy->max);
+	next_f = get_next_freq(sg_policy, sg_cpu->util, sg_cpu->max);
 	/*
 	 * Do not reduce the frequency if the CPU has not been idle
 	 * recently, as the reduction is likely to be premature then.
@@ -376,7 +373,6 @@ static void sugov_update_single_perf(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 				     unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu = container_of(hook, struct sugov_cpu, update_util);
-	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = sg_cpu->sg_policy;
 	unsigned long prev_util = sg_cpu->util;
 
 	/*
@@ -403,8 +399,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single_perf(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 		sg_cpu->util = prev_util;
 
 	cpufreq_driver_adjust_perf(sg_cpu->cpu, map_util_perf(sg_cpu->bw_dl),
-				   map_util_perf(sg_cpu->util),
-				   sg_policy->max);
+				   map_util_perf(sg_cpu->util), sg_cpu->max);
 
 	sg_cpu->sg_policy->last_freq_update_time = time;
 }
@@ -413,19 +408,25 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
 {
 	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = sg_cpu->sg_policy;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
-	unsigned long util = 0;
+	unsigned long util = 0, max = 1;
 	unsigned int j;
 
 	for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
 		struct sugov_cpu *j_sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, j);
+		unsigned long j_util, j_max;
 
 		sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu);
 		sugov_iowait_apply(j_sg_cpu, time);
+		j_util = j_sg_cpu->util;
+		j_max = j_sg_cpu->max;
 
-		util = max(j_sg_cpu->util, util);
+		if (j_util * max > j_max * util) {
+			util = j_util;
+			max = j_max;
+		}
 	}
 
-	return get_next_freq(sg_policy, util, sg_policy->max);
+	return get_next_freq(sg_policy, util, max);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -751,7 +752,7 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = policy->governor_data;
 	void (*uu)(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time, unsigned int flags);
-	unsigned int cpu = cpumask_first(policy->cpus);
+	unsigned int cpu;
 
 	sg_policy->freq_update_delay_ns	= sg_policy->tunables->rate_limit_us * NSEC_PER_USEC;
 	sg_policy->last_freq_update_time	= 0;
@@ -759,7 +760,6 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	sg_policy->work_in_progress		= false;
 	sg_policy->limits_changed		= false;
 	sg_policy->cached_raw_freq		= 0;
-	sg_policy->max				= arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
 
 	sg_policy->need_freq_update = cpufreq_driver_test_flags(CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS);
 
-- 
2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-10 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-10 19:57 Sam Wu [this message]
2022-11-15 22:35 ` [PATCH v1] Revert "cpufreq: schedutil: Move max CPU capacity to sugov_policy" Saravana Kannan
2022-11-16 11:43   ` Lukasz Luba
2022-11-16 12:17     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-18  1:00     ` Sam Wu
2022-11-21 19:18       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-22  8:58         ` Lukasz Luba
2022-11-30 10:42           ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-30 14:04             ` Lukasz Luba
2022-11-30 14:29               ` Vincent Guittot
2022-11-30 15:00                 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-11-16 11:35 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-11-20 18:07 ` [PATCH v1] Revert "cpufreq: schedutil: Move max CPU capacity to sugov_policy" #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-11-27 12:06   ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-05  9:18 ` [PATCH v1] Revert "cpufreq: schedutil: Move max CPU capacity to sugov_policy" Viresh Kumar
2022-12-06  8:17   ` Lukasz Luba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221110195732.1382314-1-wusamuel@google.com \
    --to=wusamuel@google.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=isaacmanjarres@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).