On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 06:35:57PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:49:20 +0100 > Crt Mori wrote: > > > Ok. Acked-by: Crt Mori > > (resending since previous mail was not delivered because it was not plaintext) > > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 at 11:02, Uwe Kleine-König > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 12:04:41AM +0100, Crt Mori wrote: > > > > On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 at 23:46, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > > > > > > > From: Uwe Kleine-König > > > > > > > > > > .probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine > > > > > that explicitly in the probe function. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > > > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c b/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c > > > > > index f1f5ebc145b1..19e30cfca8a7 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c > > > > > @@ -1168,9 +1168,9 @@ static int mlx90632_enable_regulator(struct mlx90632_data *data) > > > > > return ret; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > -static int mlx90632_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > > > > > - const struct i2c_device_id *id) > > > > > +static int mlx90632_probe(struct i2c_client *client) > > > > > { > > > > > + const struct i2c_device_id *id = i2c_client_get_device_id(client); > > > > > struct mlx90632_data *mlx90632; > > > > > struct iio_dev *indio_dev; > > > > > struct regmap *regmap; > > > > > @@ -1337,7 +1337,15 @@ static struct i2c_driver mlx90632_driver = { > > > > > .of_match_table = mlx90632_of_match, > > > > > .pm = pm_ptr(&mlx90632_pm_ops), > > > > > }, > > > > > +<<<<<<< ours > > > > > > > > Maybe some of the merge artifacts left (also below)? > > > > > > *groan*, ok, thanks for pointing out the obvious. Fixed in my tree. Ftr, > > > the fixup is: > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c b/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c > > > index 19e30cfca8a7..753b7a4ccfdd 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c > > > @@ -1337,15 +1337,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver mlx90632_driver = { > > > .of_match_table = mlx90632_of_match, > > > .pm = pm_ptr(&mlx90632_pm_ops), > > > }, > > > -<<<<<<< ours > > > - .probe = mlx90632_probe, > > > -||||||| base > > > - .probe = mlx90632_probe, > > > - .remove = mlx90632_remove, > > > -======= > > > .probe_new = mlx90632_probe, > > > - .remove = mlx90632_remove, > > > ->>>>>>> theirs > > > .id_table = mlx90632_id, > > > }; > > > module_i2c_driver(mlx90632_driver); > > > > > > When (and if) I'll resend the series, the fixed version will be > > > included. (Unless someone picks up the broken patch with the above > > > fixup of course :-) > Who would be crazy enough to do that? > > (fixed up whilst applying) Thanks, people seem really eager to prevent me resending the series :-) Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |