From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
To: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<martin.lau@linux.dev>, <song@kernel.org>, <yhs@fb.com>,
<john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
<sdf@google.com>, <haoluo@google.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
<illusionist.neo@gmail.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <mykolal@fb.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
<benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>, <memxor@gmail.com>,
<colin.i.king@gmail.com>, <asavkov@redhat.com>, <delyank@fb.com>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] bpf: Fix comment error in fixup_kfunc_call function
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 17:45:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221126094530.226629-5-yangjihong1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221126094530.226629-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com>
insn->imm for kfunc is the relative address of __bpf_call_base,
instead of __bpf_base_call, Fix the comment error.
Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 193ea927aa69..eb58fea645ca 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -13927,7 +13927,7 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
}
/* insn->imm has the btf func_id. Replace it with
- * an address (relative to __bpf_base_call).
+ * an address (relative to __bpf_call_base).
*/
desc = find_kfunc_desc(env->prog, insn->imm, insn->off);
if (!desc) {
--
2.30.GIT
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-26 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-26 9:45 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] bpf: Support kernel function call in 32-bit ARM Yang Jihong
2022-11-26 9:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] bpf: Adapt 32-bit return value kfunc for 32-bit ARM when zext extension Yang Jihong
2022-11-28 1:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-28 12:40 ` Yang Jihong
2022-11-28 16:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-03 2:58 ` Yang Jihong
2022-12-03 16:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-05 1:19 ` Yang Jihong
2022-12-07 8:49 ` Yang Jihong
2022-12-02 4:11 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-26 9:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] bpf: Add kernel function call support in 32-bit ARM for EABI Yang Jihong
2022-11-26 9:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] bpf:selftests: Add kfunc_call test for mixing 32-bit and 64-bit parameters Yang Jihong
2022-11-26 9:45 ` Yang Jihong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221126094530.226629-5-yangjihong1@huawei.com \
--to=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=asavkov@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=delyank@fb.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=illusionist.neo@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).