linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/sev: Add SNP-specific unaccepted memory support
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:12:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221208221248.slltzm5ehnbltdee@box.shutemov.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a46c897353203bf24bc104c314cd99dc68f5cdca.1670513353.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 09:29:13AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Add SNP-specific hooks to the unaccepted memory support in the boot
> path (__accept_memory()) and the core kernel (accept_memory()) in order
> to support booting SNP guests when unaccepted memory is present. Without
> this support, SNP guests will fail to boot and/or panic() when unaccepted
> memory is present in the EFI memory map.
> 
> The process of accepting memory under SNP involves invoking the hypervisor
> to perform a page state change for the page to private memory and then
> issuing a PVALIDATE instruction to accept the page.
> 
> Since the boot path and the core kernel paths perform similar operations,
> move the pvalidate_pages() and vmgexit_psc() functions into sev-shared.c
> to avoid code duplication.
> 
> Create the new header file arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.h because adding
> the function declaration to any of the existing SEV related header files
> pulls in too many other header files, causing the build to fail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                |   1 +
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.c  |   3 +
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c  |  54 ++++++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.h  |  23 +++++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h      |   3 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c    | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/sev.c           | 112 ++++----------------------------
>  arch/x86/mm/unaccepted_memory.c |   4 ++
>  8 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index d88f61940aa7..0704d4795919 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -1549,6 +1549,7 @@ config AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
>  	select INSTRUCTION_DECODER
>  	select ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM
>  	select X86_MEM_ENCRYPT
> +	select UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
>  	help
>  	  Say yes to enable support for the encryption of system memory.
>  	  This requires an AMD processor that supports Secure Memory

I think it misses "depends on EFI_STUB".

The code I've submitted contains "select EFI_STUB", but it causes build
issues for some configurations. I've changed it to "depends on" in git.

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-08 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-07  1:49 [PATCHv8 00/14] mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 01/14] x86/boot: Centralize __pa()/__va() definitions Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 02/14] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-09 18:10   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-12-09 19:26     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-09 22:23       ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-12-24 16:46         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-01-12 11:59           ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-12-26 12:23   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-27  3:18     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-01-16 13:04   ` Mel Gorman
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 03/14] mm: Report unaccepted memory in meminfo Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 04/14] efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820() Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 05/14] x86/boot: Add infrastructure required for unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-01-03 13:52   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 06/14] efi/x86: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-01-03 14:20   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-25  0:51     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 07/14] x86/boot/compressed: Handle " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 08/14] x86/mm: Reserve unaccepted memory bitmap Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 09/14] x86/mm: Provide helpers for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 10/14] x86/mm: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping into " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 11/14] x86: Disable kexec if system has " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 12/14] x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 13/14] x86/tdx: Refactor try_accept_one() Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-07  1:49 ` [PATCHv8 14/14] x86/tdx: Add unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-08 15:29 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] Provide SEV-SNP support for unaccepted memory Tom Lendacky
2022-12-08 15:29   ` [PATCH v6 1/5] x86/sev: Fix calculation of end address based on number of pages Tom Lendacky
2022-12-08 15:29   ` [PATCH v6 2/5] x86/sev: Put PSC struct on the stack in prep for unaccepted memory support Tom Lendacky
2022-12-08 15:29   ` [PATCH v6 3/5] x86/sev: Allow for use of the early boot GHCB for PSC requests Tom Lendacky
2022-12-08 15:29   ` [PATCH v6 4/5] x86/sev: Use large PSC requests if applicable Tom Lendacky
2022-12-08 15:29   ` [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/sev: Add SNP-specific unaccepted memory support Tom Lendacky
2022-12-08 22:12     ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2022-12-09 14:18       ` Tom Lendacky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221208221248.slltzm5ehnbltdee@box.shutemov.name \
    --to=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).