From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A7CC4332F for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 22:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230189AbiLIWGa (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 17:06:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53114 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230182AbiLIWGE (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 17:06:04 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83399B6DBB; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 14:05:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1240A62369; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 22:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 257ADC433D2; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 22:05:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1670623551; bh=9QnxbRoY+pBX1dZprX1kqF0RngWjQqOSexpJVjiSliA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dqvLBb/iWlF6fD29z+elVd6K7AWA58vr+UX/x+1MGvl8cPu8U364JG6x1alMAxlB3 +rkip2RApgFTJCUvLeBEtfEi1VWMrO+It2/ol4snzqRd9r8BMKkFMSKzjpRQFZephY dLq5+Slm1l7Q4cBnUjfL6kZWwsSbD39yq/pspcEYbCKSCOFG1OxLwuNHBc+lkjzmT7 zWsMUQy80lS9+9pYgBQ20b+ZLbS5HVeBTdxTIcCileHqf09YRqu3087861bNtw3znW RpSuUnlD15QQ/5ydCmubCZiIM8StOdcrSWXPvUJ3v9GLfY/dD4DyB/gL9xpt62EhCq YIU/GuaePYFvQ== Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 14:05:50 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Linus Torvalds Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jiri Olsa , Yonghong Song Subject: Re: [PULL] Networking for v6.1 final / v6.1-rc9 (with the diff stat :S) Message-ID: <20221209140550.571e6b65@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20221209130001.0f90f7f8@kernel.org> References: <20221208205639.1799257-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20221208210009.1799399-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20221209130001.0f90f7f8@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 13:00:01 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:25:09 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > There is an outstanding regression in BPF / Peter's static calls stuff, > > > > Looks like it's not related to the static calls. Jiri says that > > reverting that static call change makes no difference, and currently > > suspects a RCU race instead: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Y5M9P95l85oMHki9@krava/T/#t > > > > Hmm? > > Yes. I can't quickly grok how the static call changes impacted > the locking. I'll poke the BPF people to give us a sense of urgency. > IDK how likely it is to get hold of Peter Z.. Adding Alexei et al. to the CC. What I understood from off-list comments is the issue is not a showstopper and synchronize_rcu_tasks() seems like a good fix.