linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
	Nagareddy Reddy <nspreddy@google.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [RFC 13/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Wrap uses of kvm_handle_gfn_range in mmu.c
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 22:24:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221221222418.3307832-14-bgardon@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221221222418.3307832-1-bgardon@google.com>

handle_gfn_range + callback is not a bad interface, but it requires
exporting the whole callback scheme to mmu.c. Simplify the interface
with some basic wrapper functions, making the callback scheme internal
to shadow_mmu.c.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c        |  8 +++---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.h | 25 ++++------------
 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index ce2a6dd38c67..ceb3146016d0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	bool flush = false;
 
 	if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
-		flush = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_zap_rmap);
+		flush = kvm_shadow_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, range);
 
 	if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm))
 		flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, range, flush);
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ bool kvm_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	bool flush = false;
 
 	if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
-		flush = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_set_pte_rmap);
+		flush = kvm_shadow_mmu_set_spte_gfn(kvm, range);
 
 	if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm))
 		flush |= kvm_tdp_mmu_set_spte_gfn(kvm, range);
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	bool young = false;
 
 	if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
-		young = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_age_rmap);
+		young = kvm_shadow_mmu_age_gfn_range(kvm, range);
 
 	if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm))
 		young |= kvm_tdp_mmu_age_gfn_range(kvm, range);
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ bool kvm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	bool young = false;
 
 	if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
-		young = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_test_age_rmap);
+		young = kvm_shadow_mmu_test_age_gfn(kvm, range);
 
 	if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm))
 		young |= kvm_tdp_mmu_test_age_gfn(kvm, range);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.c
index 77472eb9b06a..1c6ff6fe3d2c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.c
@@ -862,16 +862,16 @@ static bool __kvm_zap_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 	return kvm_zap_all_rmap_sptes(kvm, rmap_head);
 }
 
-bool kvm_zap_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-		  pte_t unused)
+static bool kvm_zap_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			 struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
+			 pte_t unused)
 {
 	return __kvm_zap_rmap(kvm, rmap_head, slot);
 }
 
-bool kvm_set_pte_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		      struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-		      pte_t pte)
+static bool kvm_set_pte_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			     struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
+			     pte_t pte)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
 	struct rmap_iterator iter;
@@ -978,9 +978,13 @@ static void slot_rmap_walk_next(struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator)
 	     slot_rmap_walk_okay(_iter_);				\
 	     slot_rmap_walk_next(_iter_))
 
-__always_inline bool kvm_handle_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm,
-					  struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
-					  rmap_handler_t handler)
+typedef bool (*rmap_handler_t)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
+			       int level, pte_t pte);
+
+static __always_inline bool
+kvm_handle_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
+		     rmap_handler_t handler)
 {
 	struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator iterator;
 	bool ret = false;
@@ -993,9 +997,9 @@ __always_inline bool kvm_handle_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-bool kvm_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-		  pte_t unused)
+static bool kvm_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			 struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
+			 pte_t unused)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
 	struct rmap_iterator iter;
@@ -1007,9 +1011,9 @@ bool kvm_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 	return young;
 }
 
-bool kvm_test_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
-		       int level, pte_t unused)
+static bool kvm_test_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+			      struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
+			      int level, pte_t unused)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
 	struct rmap_iterator iter;
@@ -3508,3 +3512,23 @@ void kvm_shadow_mmu_wrprot_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
 	slot_handle_level(kvm, memslot, slot_rmap_write_protect,
 			  start_level, KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL, false);
 }
+
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
+{
+	return kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_zap_rmap);
+}
+
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
+{
+	return kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_set_pte_rmap);
+}
+
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_age_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
+{
+	return kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_age_rmap);
+}
+
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
+{
+	return kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_test_age_rmap);
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.h
index 397fb463ef54..2ded3d674cb0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/shadow_mmu.h
@@ -26,26 +26,6 @@ struct pte_list_desc {
 /* Only exported for debugfs.c. */
 unsigned int pte_list_count(struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head);
 
-bool kvm_zap_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-		  pte_t unused);
-bool kvm_set_pte_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		      struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-		      pte_t pte);
-
-typedef bool (*rmap_handler_t)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-			       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
-			       int level, pte_t pte);
-bool kvm_handle_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
-			  rmap_handler_t handler);
-
-bool kvm_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
-		  pte_t unused);
-bool kvm_test_age_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
-		       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
-		       int level, pte_t unused);
-
 void __clear_sp_write_flooding_count(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
 
 bool __kvm_shadow_mmu_prepare_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
@@ -101,6 +81,11 @@ void kvm_shadow_mmu_wrprot_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
 				const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
 				int start_level);
 
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_age_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
+bool kvm_shadow_mmu_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
+
 /* Exports from paging_tmpl.h */
 gpa_t paging32_gva_to_gpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
 			  gpa_t vaddr, u64 access,
-- 
2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-21 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-21 22:24 [RFC 00/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Formalize the Shadow MMU Ben Gardon
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 01/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Add shadow_mmu.(c|h) Ben Gardon
2023-02-01 19:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-01 19:48     ` Ben Gardon
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 02/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Expose functions for the Shadow MMU Ben Gardon
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 03/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Move the Shadow MMU implementation to shadow_mmu.c Ben Gardon
2022-12-21 22:40   ` Ben Gardon
2023-01-13 18:06     ` Vipin Sharma
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 04/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Expose functions for paging_tmpl.h Ben Gardon
2023-01-06 19:49   ` David Matlack
2023-01-09 18:47     ` Ben Gardon
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 05/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Move paging_tmpl.h includes to shadow_mmu.c Ben Gardon
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 06/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Clean up Shadow MMU exports Ben Gardon
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 07/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Cleanup shrinker interface with Shadow MMU Ben Gardon
2023-01-13 17:43   ` Vipin Sharma
2023-01-13 17:51   ` Vipin Sharma
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 08/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Clean up naming of exported Shadow MMU functions Ben Gardon
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 09/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Only make pages available on Shadow MMU fault Ben Gardon
2022-12-29 18:30   ` David Matlack
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 10/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Fix naming on prepare / commit zap page functions Ben Gardon
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 11/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Factor Shadow MMU wrprot / clear dirty ops out of mmu.c Ben Gardon
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 12/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Remove unneeded exports from shadow_mmu.c Ben Gardon
2022-12-21 22:24 ` Ben Gardon [this message]
2023-02-01 21:25   ` [RFC 13/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Wrap uses of kvm_handle_gfn_range in mmu.c Sean Christopherson
2023-02-01 22:30     ` Ben Gardon
2022-12-21 22:24 ` [RFC 14/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Add kvm_shadow_mmu_ to the last few functions in shadow_mmu.h Ben Gardon
2023-01-06 19:18 ` [RFC 00/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Formalize the Shadow MMU David Matlack
2023-01-09 18:43   ` Ben Gardon
2023-02-01 20:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-01 20:45   ` Ben Gardon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221221222418.3307832-14-bgardon@google.com \
    --to=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nspreddy@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vipinsh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).