From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA588C54E94 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 09:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236553AbjAZJnM (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 04:43:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49138 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233071AbjAZJnJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 04:43:09 -0500 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 383C993EB; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 01:43:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0973F20265; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:43:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D3n78DnnaS0g; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:43:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailout1.secunet.com (mailout1.secunet.com [62.96.220.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70ECD201E4; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:43:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from cas-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.201]) by mailout1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6132680004A; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:43:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.34; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:43:04 +0100 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.34; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:43:03 +0100 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B49063180DFB; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:43:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:43:03 +0100 From: Steffen Klassert To: Jakub Kicinski CC: Leon Romanovsky , "David S . Miller" , Andy Gospodarek , Ayush Sawal , Eric Dumazet , Herbert Xu , , "Jay Vosburgh" , Jesse Brandeburg , Jonathan Corbet , , , , , Paolo Abeni , Raju Rangoju , Saeed Mahameed , Simon Horman , Tony Nguyen , Veaceslav Falico Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 00/10] Convert drivers to return XFRM configuration errors through extack Message-ID: <20230126094303.GA665047@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <20230125110133.7195b663@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230125110133.7195b663@kernel.org> X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:01:33AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 13:54:56 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > This series continues effort started by Sabrina to return XFRM configuration > > errors through extack. It allows for user space software stack easily present > > driver failure reasons to users. > > Steffen, would you like to take these into your tree or should we apply > directly? Looks like mostly driver changes. You can just take it directly as it is mostly driver changes. The ipsec-next tree is currently empty so there will be no conflicts. Thanks!