linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 02/23] net: phy: add genphy_c45_read_eee_abilities() function
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:49:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230206104955.GE12366@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230204005418.7ryb4ihuzxlbs2nl@skbuf>

Hi Vladimir,

On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 02:54:18AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:58:24PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:

[....]

> > +static const int phy_eee_100_10000_features_array[6] = {
> 
> Don't need array length unless the array is sparse, which isn't the case here.
> 
> > +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT,
> > +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT,
> > +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseT_Full_BIT,
> > +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseKX_Full_BIT,
> > +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseKX4_Full_BIT,
> > +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseKR_Full_BIT,
> 
> Why stop at 10GBase-KR? Register 3.20 defines EEE abilities up to 100G
> (for speeds >10G, there seem to be 2 modes, "deep sleep" or "fast wake",
> with "deep sleep" being essentially equivalent to the only mode
> available for <=10G modes).

Hm,

If i take only deep sleep, missing modes are:
3.20.13 100GBASE-R deep sleep
       family of Physical Layer devices using 100GBASE-R encoding:
       100000baseCR4_Full
       100000baseKR4_Full
       100000baseCR10_Full (missing)
       100000baseSR4_Full
       100000baseSR10_Full (missing)
       100000baseLR4_ER4_Full

3.20.11 25GBASE-R deep sleep
       family of Physical Layer devices using 25GBASE-R encoding:
       25000baseCR_Full
       25000baseER_Full (missing)
       25000baseKR_Full
       25000baseLR_Full (missing)
       25000baseSR_Full

3.20.9 40GBASE-R deep sleep
       family of Physical Layer devices using 40GBASE-R encoding:
       40000baseKR4_Full
       40000baseCR4_Full
       40000baseSR4_Full
       40000baseLR4_Full

3.20.7 40GBASE-T
       40000baseT_Full (missing)

I have no experience with modes > 1Gbit. Do all of them correct? What
should we do with missing modes? Or may be it make sense to implement >
10G modes separately?

Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-06 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-01 14:58 [PATCH net-next v4 00/23] net: add EEE support for KSZ9477 and AR8035 with i.MX6 Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/23] net: dsa: microchip: enable EEE support Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-04  0:14   ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/23] net: phy: add genphy_c45_read_eee_abilities() function Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 17:12   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-04  0:54   ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-06 10:49     ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2023-02-06 11:22       ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-06 15:42         ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/23] net: phy: micrel: add ksz9477_get_features() Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/23] net: phy: export phy_check_valid() function Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 17:15   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/23] net: phy: add genphy_c45_ethtool_get/set_eee() support Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 17:20   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-01 20:18   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-04  1:11   ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/23] net: phy: c22: migrate to genphy_c45_write_eee_adv() Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 17:28   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/23] net: phy: c45: " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/23] net: phy: migrate phy_init_eee() to genphy_c45_eee_is_active() Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 16:41   ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/23] net: phy: start using genphy_c45_ethtool_get/set_eee() Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/23] net: phy: add driver specific get/set_eee support Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 11/23] net: phy: at803x: implement ethtool access to SmartEEE functionality Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 12/23] net: phy: at803x: ar8035: fix EEE support for half duplex links Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 13/23] net: phy: add PHY specifica flag to signal SmartEEE support Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 14/23] net: phy: at803x: add PHY_SMART_EEE flag to AR8035 Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 15/23] net: phy: add phy_has_smarteee() helper Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 16/23] net: fec: add support for PHYs with SmartEEE support Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 17/23] e1000e: replace EEE ethtool helpers to linkmode variants Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 18/23] igb: " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 19/23] igc: " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 20/23] tg3: " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 21/23] r8152: " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 22/23] net: usb: ax88179_178a: " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-01 14:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 23/23] net: mdio: drop EEE ethtool helpers in favor " Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-04  0:13 ` [PATCH net-next v4 00/23] net: add EEE support for KSZ9477 and AR8035 with i.MX6 Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-06  5:47   ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-06 14:10     ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-06 15:39       ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-06 18:37         ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-06 20:21           ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-06 18:25       ` Oleksij Rempel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230206104955.GE12366@pengutronix.de \
    --to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).