From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF17C678D4 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 14:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231235AbjCFOud (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2023 09:50:33 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54642 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231233AbjCFOuW (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2023 09:50:22 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D4D2716 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 06:49:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id r5so10738987qtp.4 for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 06:49:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelfernandes.org; s=google; t=1678114190; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CRWs2EFCPuBMPKV81kaTXM8CT+AT1P7bsl0h2Aecgew=; b=qc3iLB4VuhZnZ6itNutIAclg/fR/X2D3ZMlruWowvT6We1OxrMRBq4iTOlWiftfrOr s8+5x5T7UNgaAcV6r0r16Fghl15tKgjFmdjjOq0vTX8ISy5oo403LT5OOC7t4TIN0oyt biKyavNw79axnKL8oS+1PbwgMBtw8At1eq0yo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678114190; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CRWs2EFCPuBMPKV81kaTXM8CT+AT1P7bsl0h2Aecgew=; b=OAryjLe8tZ5BvUM4dcya6RSb3zUkfeKjDokDrX0Eh7JAQjmD8n1sN2o3EwOJTpuX+U IWbnR3u68R3krYzkPDuRswpjaZ0xXOK+GEt6fbHDRHwOvNiFUnmQ8wrpbBdRixewm0er sR77qx+ImXma/YSEDYhIODZ0RG5dFTtywXJbdYF8jjWuNxtgsf2wVFShYwBYN53XBW5d 5XQvZ8BIbQXutN1lly1hRcmBNF+6l8R55xe4hlgz9/jVveb3IxFjF1lKTX95Ixz6O+We IgnzoPzBbiA1pevzaY57xnxkrJYPfqkqzOobaCXeIcd1p9tl7JBqEnm2UAAqPf0+rBz9 SGLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKV/yVv47FyhretY4oyUWuPeNCMoL9wVG6eSiLKci58//Vj2gi9Z D53EulOTM6NtmwS9e87Qx6YfaQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9Sw1c226vsFw+2m8ajyGEeRUjI4xT7GzUOBssiEMMvCLSo6OgyjC4l5BQEtTvt73srCs1lvw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1443:b0:3bf:d4c3:365d with SMTP id v3-20020a05622a144300b003bfd4c3365dmr18743306qtx.14.1678114189869; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 06:49:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (129.239.188.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.188.239.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w25-20020a05620a129900b0073ba211e765sm7548983qki.19.2023.03.06.06.49.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Mar 2023 06:49:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 14:49:48 +0000 From: Joel Fernandes To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , LKML , RCU , Oleksiy Avramchenko , Jens Axboe , Philipp Reisner , Bryan Tan , Steven Rostedt , Eric Dumazet , Bob Pearson , Ariel Levkovich , Theodore Ts'o , Julian Anastasov Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] rcu/kvfree: Eliminate k[v]free_rcu() single argument macro Message-ID: <20230306144948.GA3280216@google.com> References: <20230305180524.GL1301832@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20230305180524.GL1301832@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 10:05:24AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 07:56:33AM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 2023, at 6:41 AM, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > > > >  > > >> > > >>>> On Mar 5, 2023, at 5:29 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi, All, > > >>> > > >>>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 10:11 AM Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> For a single argument invocations a new kfree_rcu_mightsleep() > > >>>> and kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() macroses are used. This is done in > > >>>> order to prevent users from calling a single argument from > > >>>> atomic contexts as "_mightsleep" prefix signals that it can > > >>>> schedule(). > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> Since this commit in -dev branch [1] suggests more users still need > > >>> conversion, let us drop this single patch for 6.4 and move the rest of > > >>> the series forward? Let me know if you disagree. > > >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git/commit/?h=dev&id=9bf5e3a2626ed474d080f695007541b6ecd6e60b > > >>> > > >>> All -- please supply Ack/Review tags for patches 1-12. > > >> > > >> Or put another way, what is the transition plan for these remaining users? > > >> > > >> I am getting on a plane right now but I can research which users are remaining later. > > >> > > > I am not sure. I think we can cover it on the meeting. > > > > Cool, thanks. > > My current plan is as follows: > > 1. Addition of kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() went into v6.3. > > 2. After creating branches, I send out the series, including 12/12. > The -rcu tree's "dev" branch continues to have a revert to avoid > breaking -next until we achieve clean -next and clean "dev" > branch. > > 3. Any conversion patches that get maintainer acks go into v6.4. > Along with a checkpatch error, as Joel notes below. > > 4. There are periodic checks for new code using the single-argument > forms of kfree_rcu() and kvfree_rcu(). Patches are produced > for them, or responses to the patches introducing them, as > appropriate. A coccinelle script might be helpful, perhaps > even as part of kernel test robot or similar. > > 5. The -rcu tree's "dev" branch will revert to unclean from time > to time as maintainers choose to take conversion patches into > their own trees. > > 6. Once mainline is clean, we push 12/12 into the next merge > window. Since in theory, mainline could also be after 6.4-rc1, I am assuming next merge window could also mean 6.5 right? But yes, agreed. > 7. We then evaluate whether further cleanups are needed. > > > > My feeling is > > > that, we introduced "_mightsleep" macros first and after that try to > > > convert users. > > > One stopgap could be to add a checkpatch error if anyone tries to use old API, > > and then in the meanwhile convert all users. > > Though, that requires people listening to checkpatch complaints. > > Every person who listens is that much less hassle. It doesn't have to > be perfect. ;-) The below checkpatch change can catch at least simple single-arg uses (i.e. not having compound expressions inside of k[v]free_rcu() args). I will submit a proper patch to it which we can include in this set. Thoughts? --- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index 78cc595b98ce..fc73786064b3 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -6362,6 +6362,15 @@ sub process { } } +# check for soon-to-be-deprecated single-argument k[v]free_rcu() API + if ($line =~ /\bk[v]?free_rcu\s*\([^(]+\)/) { + if ($line =~ /\bk[v]?free_rcu\s*\([^,]+\)/) { + ERROR("DEPRECATED_API", + "Single-argument k[v]free_rcu() API is deprecated, please pass an rcu_head object." . $herecurr); + } + } + + # check for unnecessary "Out of Memory" messages if ($line =~ /^\+.*\b$logFunctions\s*\(/ && $prevline =~ /^[ \+]\s*if\s*\(\s*(\!\s*|NULL\s*==\s*)?($Lval)(\s*==\s*NULL\s*)?\s*\)/ && -- 2.40.0.rc0.216.gc4246ad0f0-goog