linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] entry/rcu: Check TIF_RESCHED _after_ delayed RCU wake-up
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 19:43:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230315194349.10798-3-joel@joelfernandes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230315194349.10798-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

RCU sometimes needs to perform a delayed wake up for specific kthreads
handling offloaded callbacks (RCU_NOCB).  These wakeups are performed
by timers and upon entry to idle (also to guest and to user on nohz_full).

However the delayed wake-up on kernel exit is actually performed after
the thread flags are fetched towards the fast path check for work to
do on exit to user. As a result, and if there is no other pending work
to do upon that kernel exit, the current task will resume to userspace
with TIF_RESCHED set and the pending wake up ignored.

Fix this with fetching the thread flags _after_ the delayed RCU-nocb
kthread wake-up.

Fixes: 47b8ff194c1f ("entry: Explicitly flush pending rcuog wakeup before last rescheduling point")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
 kernel/entry/common.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
index 846add8394c4..a134e26b58c6 100644
--- a/kernel/entry/common.c
+++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
@@ -192,13 +192,14 @@ static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
 
 static void exit_to_user_mode_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	unsigned long ti_work = read_thread_flags();
+	unsigned long ti_work;
 
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
 
 	/* Flush pending rcuog wakeup before the last need_resched() check */
 	tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
 
+	ti_work = read_thread_flags();
 	if (unlikely(ti_work & EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK))
 		ti_work = exit_to_user_mode_loop(regs, ti_work);
 
-- 
2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-15 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-15 19:43 [PATCH 1/9] rcu: Fix set/clear TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP bitmask race Joel Fernandes (Google)
2023-03-15 19:43 ` [PATCH 2/9] rcu: Fix missing TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU_EXP dependency check Joel Fernandes (Google)
2023-03-15 19:43 ` Joel Fernandes (Google) [this message]
2023-03-21 14:20   ` [tip: core/urgent] entry/rcu: Check TIF_RESCHED _after_ delayed RCU wake-up tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-03-15 19:43 ` [PATCH 4/9] rcu: Register rcu-lazy shrinker only for CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y kernels Joel Fernandes (Google)
2023-03-15 23:19   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-03-16  2:28     ` Joel Fernandes
2023-03-15 19:43 ` [PATCH 5/9] rcu: Remove never-set needwake assignment from rcu_report_qs_rdp() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2023-03-15 19:43 ` [PATCH 6/9] rcu: Permit start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() to be invoked early Joel Fernandes (Google)
2023-03-15 19:43 ` [PATCH 7/9] rcu-tasks: Report stalls during synchronize_srcu() in rcu_tasks_postscan() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2023-03-15 19:43 ` [PATCH 8/9] rcu: Avoid stack overflow due to __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() being kprobe-ed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2023-03-15 19:43 ` [PATCH 9/9] rcu: Protect rcu_print_task_exp_stall() ->exp_tasks access Joel Fernandes (Google)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230315194349.10798-3-joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).