On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 03:34:52PM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> Drop legacy gpio request/free since we are using
> pinctrl for this now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c | 16 ----------------
>  1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c
> index 8bfe6cfbb3db..657adb011aeb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c
> @@ -45,20 +45,6 @@ static inline struct ep93xx_pwm *to_ep93xx_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
>  	return container_of(chip, struct ep93xx_pwm, chip);
>  }
>  
> -static int ep93xx_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> -{
> -	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(chip->dev);
> -
> -	return ep93xx_pwm_acquire_gpio(pdev);

I didn't get the whole series and didn't spot a relevant followup change
on lore.k.o, so: I assume ep93xx_pwm_acquire_gpio() and
ep93xx_pwm_release_gpio() will be unused in the end? Do you drop them?

I assume this series target to be taken via arm-soc (once the review
feedback is positive)?

I wonder if this change breaks non-dt machine support?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |