From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FF1C77B7C for ; Sun, 28 May 2023 10:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229482AbjE1KRa (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 May 2023 06:17:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56528 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229437AbjE1KR3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 May 2023 06:17:29 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AE9BB; Sun, 28 May 2023 03:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 34SAH2PX002019; Sun, 28 May 2023 12:17:02 +0200 Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 12:17:02 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= Cc: Zhangjin Wu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Message-ID: <20230528101702.GG1956@1wt.eu> References: <20230528075955.GE1956@1wt.eu> <210e5ed9-be89-4e48-9c1e-3eb5b0dd288a@t-8ch.de> <30bf1742-64ff-4f92-beab-332108d0201f@t-8ch.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <30bf1742-64ff-4f92-beab-332108d0201f@t-8ch.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 11:41:53AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > If you are fine with pushing more stuff to this branch, picking up > > the fix for the duplicated test gettimeofday_bad2 (7) would be nice, too. > > And the ppoll() argument cleanup (10) for that matter. OK now both done, thank you. > IMO it would be more convenient to move generic cleanup patches to the > beginning of the series. > When the reviewers are focussing on the real changes they won't be > interrupted by the cleanups. Also the maintainer can more easily pick > them up independently, so they are dealt with and nobody has to worry > about them anymore. Agreed! Thanks! Willy