From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0C0C77B7A for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 16:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236031AbjFBQKN (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2023 12:10:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35064 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236616AbjFBQJc (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2023 12:09:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x549.google.com (mail-pg1-x549.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::549]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52C30E42 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 09:09:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x549.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5340957a1f1so975249a12.1 for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2023 09:09:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1685722167; x=1688314167; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vX8ZCjC9l+xt5cqUnwzlqCkk/7EvJIEZcs67EwYM95Y=; b=ZpYUhbbZC6uUYrReM+ixNdEUwp22WUU7l8j2aahWsJUYqP381L7DaYeopKye6+Q9sn w6jGO0nX6WnAtH7Q3sGlOdc68vECR5PacYtF8uFrv3gPYqUB1KYLtsQIi3wA+701ktoo VcYLyZENUnFYI88cWmJbgLosheXItBqWsjUj1JOOFK7yQMQ1EVYBrKEM74EAZ9G1JJes +Fy3XP3gLD3JszJ1CTZiXeoILpXFoZBpgnn/vdDYBMvk+Dqwv0kvHMMpaOH7tt3QFj+s ke1ao1kRwftxIusnCaBSonu2zz1KVzCGGfUgW7HZsGqYe4xCh5lCKxmVw7qkF3LGd5ny Gpkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685722167; x=1688314167; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vX8ZCjC9l+xt5cqUnwzlqCkk/7EvJIEZcs67EwYM95Y=; b=T5t8ks4w6Pa7UI8Az3p3S7mlR7AhPmb2Xi4Ob+ZcuTp4zIqRUE1P2DNcm89tJN+yyv B/FFCoIGC1WPfLLT38OKilo6SSXbb4Wrdn8SXCGVyxbtIhwtbscoa3qeIFLCQo7sViUo OMnDdDUN1XXqPIclfpISFgqMwZuEzHjpg/tsQef8uDPanUrwm0YZW60saCBgUmOknzJ2 GLnil30X4E5MTsCyas3XI8GlKeRMHdqiYjFLq3TaPIb+I+kV2AmI5NnXGMBWYGxTGk0U U9dS9mnrTvES+Tcx+6vYk9s/W2gMd2e/VsjkxubMt+dk2sH5P4y5Qh2j51b8fGewtFe5 Wesw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwFzbvauoPEPeZJROAZepCks2xso8gIpY2UmyYJKGZAh8cquB1L tX20Ze1x+vHX4sBN68LSp0fGt7zp8SWs X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7w+3zMwOJ66cN0pwH2useIGj7AgTlfLjnw5VFZgi7VE2BNKptqAZGtU12TE7bl7/aJEHHayi6hzCyj X-Received: from vipin.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:479f]) (user=vipinsh job=sendgmr) by 2002:a63:685:0:b0:530:866e:c3c1 with SMTP id 127-20020a630685000000b00530866ec3c1mr2520235pgg.11.1685722167618; Fri, 02 Jun 2023 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 09:09:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20230602160914.4011728-1-vipinsh@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230602160914.4011728-1-vipinsh@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0.rc0.172.g3f132b7071-goog Message-ID: <20230602160914.4011728-5-vipinsh@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 04/16] KVM: selftests: Print read-write progress by vCPUs in dirty_log_perf_test From: Vipin Sharma To: maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, chenhuacai@kernel.org, aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, anup@brainfault.org, atishp@atishpatra.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, dmatlack@google.com, ricarkol@google.com Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vipin Sharma Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fetch count of read and write accesses from guest code and print sum of these values across all vCPUs in dirty_log_perf_test. This data provides progress made by vCPUs during dirty logging operations. Since, vCPUs execute in lockstep with userspace dirty log iterations, this metric is not very interesting. However, in future commits when dirty_log_perf_test can execute vCPUs independently from dirty log iterations then this metric can give good measure of vCPUs performance during dirty logging. Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma --- .../selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c index 2e31f13aaba6..14b012a0dcb1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include "kvm_util.h" @@ -66,17 +67,22 @@ static u64 dirty_log_manual_caps; static bool host_quit; static int iteration; static int vcpu_last_completed_iteration[KVM_MAX_VCPUS]; +static atomic_ullong total_reads; +static atomic_ullong total_writes; static void vcpu_worker(struct memstress_vcpu_args *vcpu_args) { struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = vcpu_args->vcpu; int vcpu_idx = vcpu_args->vcpu_idx; uint64_t pages_count = 0; + uint64_t reads = 0; + uint64_t writes = 0; struct kvm_run *run; struct timespec start; struct timespec ts_diff; struct timespec total = (struct timespec){0}; struct timespec avg; + struct ucall uc = {}; int ret; run = vcpu->run; @@ -89,7 +95,7 @@ static void vcpu_worker(struct memstress_vcpu_args *vcpu_args) ts_diff = timespec_elapsed(start); TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "vcpu_run failed: %d\n", ret); - TEST_ASSERT(get_ucall(vcpu, NULL) == UCALL_SYNC, + TEST_ASSERT(get_ucall(vcpu, &uc) == UCALL_SYNC, "Invalid guest sync status: exit_reason=%s\n", exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason)); @@ -101,6 +107,8 @@ static void vcpu_worker(struct memstress_vcpu_args *vcpu_args) if (current_iteration) { pages_count += vcpu_args->pages; total = timespec_add(total, ts_diff); + reads += uc.args[2]; + writes += uc.args[3]; pr_debug("vCPU %d iteration %d dirty memory time: %ld.%.9lds\n", vcpu_idx, current_iteration, ts_diff.tv_sec, ts_diff.tv_nsec); @@ -123,6 +131,8 @@ static void vcpu_worker(struct memstress_vcpu_args *vcpu_args) pr_debug("\nvCPU %d dirtied 0x%lx pages over %d iterations in %ld.%.9lds. (Avg %ld.%.9lds/iteration)\n", vcpu_idx, pages_count, vcpu_last_completed_iteration[vcpu_idx], total.tv_sec, total.tv_nsec, avg.tv_sec, avg.tv_nsec); + atomic_fetch_add(&total_reads, reads); + atomic_fetch_add(&total_writes, writes); } struct test_params { @@ -270,6 +280,8 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg) dirty_log_manual_caps); arch_setup_vm(vm, nr_vcpus); + atomic_store(&total_reads, 0); + atomic_store(&total_writes, 0); /* Start the iterations */ iteration = 0; @@ -388,6 +400,10 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg) clear_dirty_log_total.tv_nsec, avg.tv_sec, avg.tv_nsec); } + pr_info("Total pages touched: %llu (Reads: %llu, Writes: %llu)\n", + atomic_load(&total_reads) + atomic_load(&total_writes), + atomic_load(&total_reads), atomic_load(&total_writes)); + free_bitmaps(bitmaps, p->slots); arch_cleanup_vm(vm); memstress_destroy_vm(vm); -- 2.41.0.rc0.172.g3f132b7071-goog