linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
	vschneid@redhat.com, joshdon@google.com,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement shared wakequeue in CFS
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 11:27:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230614092707.GG1639749@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230614043529.GA1942@ziqianlu-dell>

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:35:29PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 10:32:03AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > Still gotta read it properly, however:
> > 
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:20:04AM -0500, David Vernet wrote:
> > > Single-socket | 32-core | 2-CCX | AMD 7950X Zen4
> > > Single-socket | 72-core | 6-CCX | AMD Milan Zen3
> > > Single-socket | 176-core | 11-CCX | 2-CCX per CCD | AMD Bergamo Zen4c
> > 
> > Could you please also benchmark on something Intel that has these stupid
> > large LLCs ?
> > 
> > Because the last time I tried something like this, it came apart real
> > quick. And AMD has these relatively small 8-core LLCs.
> 
> I tested on Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8358, which has 2 sockets and each
> socket has a single LLC with 32 cores/64threads.

> The lock contention due to the per-LLC swqueue->lock is quite serious:

Yep, that's what I was expecting -- complete meltdown that.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-14  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-13  5:20 [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: Implement shared wakequeue in CFS David Vernet
2023-06-13  5:20 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] sched: Make migrate_task_to() take any task David Vernet
2023-06-21 13:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-22  2:07     ` David Vernet
2023-06-13  5:20 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: Add SWQUEUE sched feature and skeleton calls David Vernet
2023-06-21 12:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-22 14:53     ` David Vernet
2023-06-13  5:20 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement shared wakequeue in CFS David Vernet
2023-06-13  8:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-14  4:35     ` Aaron Lu
2023-06-14  9:27       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-06-15  0:01       ` David Vernet
2023-06-15  4:49         ` Aaron Lu
2023-06-15  7:31           ` Aaron Lu
2023-06-15 23:26             ` David Vernet
2023-06-16  0:53               ` Aaron Lu
2023-06-20 17:36                 ` David Vernet
2023-06-21  2:35                   ` Aaron Lu
2023-06-21  2:43                     ` David Vernet
2023-06-21  4:54                       ` Aaron Lu
2023-06-21  5:43                         ` David Vernet
2023-06-21  6:03                           ` Aaron Lu
2023-06-22 15:57                             ` Chris Mason
2023-06-13  8:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-14 20:26     ` David Vernet
2023-06-16  8:08   ` Vincent Guittot
2023-06-20 19:54     ` David Vernet
2023-06-20 21:37       ` Roman Gushchin
2023-06-21 14:22       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-19  6:13   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-06-20 20:08     ` David Vernet
2023-06-21  8:17       ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-06-22  1:43         ` David Vernet
2023-06-22  9:11           ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-06-22 10:29             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-23  9:50               ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-06-26  6:04                 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-06-27  3:17                   ` David Vernet
2023-06-27 16:31                     ` Chris Mason
2023-06-21 14:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 20:34     ` David Vernet
2023-06-22 10:58       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-22 14:43         ` David Vernet
2023-07-10 11:57 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] " K Prateek Nayak
2023-07-11  4:43   ` David Vernet
2023-07-11  5:06     ` K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230614092707.GG1639749@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).